Thanks everyone for the feedback. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-Windows--Stable-enough-for-production-use--tp26807322... Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I've been using FreeSWITCH on Windows lately and seems to work pretty well. Sangoma has been testing more and more lately the Windows drivers with FreeSWITCH, and I think you should be just fine.I have not tested 1.0.4 though, always using trunk, if you are going to be using PSTN lines (and therefore requiring openzap) I think it would be a good idea for you to use trunk and latest wanpipe drivers. -- Moises Silva Senior Software Engineer Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3 Canada t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. moy@sangoma.com On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Michael Giagnocavo <mgg@giagnocavo.net>wrote:

We switched to Windows for production after 1.0.4. We've run into no stability issues with it. The highest we go is only 100 sessions/sec. We're also use media bypass and mod_managed.

-Michael

-----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Fred-145 Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:39 AM To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use?

Hello

Since Freeswitch is also available for Windows (and Mac, but I don't anything about Macintosh), I'd like some feedback from users who routinely run Freeswitch on that OS.

Is it stable enough to be used in production to handle a single analog line (ie. SOHO use), or should I warn customers that they really should buy a dedicated Linux box to run FS?

Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-Windows--Stable-enough-for-production-use--tp26807322... Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

I run FreeSWITCH on a Windows Server 2008 R2 (x64) box with several analog lines and it works very well. mercutioviz wrote:

And we shouldn't be using 1.0.4 anyway, should we? ;) -MC

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Moises Silva <moises.silva@gmail.com>wrote:

...

I've been using FreeSWITCH on Windows lately and seems to work pretty well. Sangoma has been testing more and more lately the Windows drivers with FreeSWITCH, and I think you should be just fine.I have not tested 1.0.4 though, always using trunk, if you are going to be using PSTN lines (and therefore requiring openzap) I think it would be a good idea for you to use trunk and latest wanpipe drivers.

-- Moises Silva Senior Software Engineer Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3 Canada t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. moy@sangoma.com

_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

-- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Windows-Stable-enough-for-production-use-tp4174199p4183... Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.