On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Michael Giagnocavo <mgg@giagnocavo.net> wrote:

We switched to Windows for production after 1.0.4. We've run into no stability issues with it. The highest we go is only 100 sessions/sec. We're also use media bypass and mod_managed.

-Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Fred-145
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:39 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org

Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use?

Hello

Since Freeswitch is also available for Windows (and Mac, but I don't anything about Macintosh), I'd like some feedback from users who routinely run Freeswitch on that OS.

Is it stable enough to be used in production to handle a single analog line (ie. SOHO use), or should I warn customers that they really should buy a dedicated Linux box to run FS?

Thank you.
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-Windows--Stable-enough-for-production-use--tp26807322p26807322.html
Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org