If I have a conference created on node A with name abc-domain@default and another with the same name in node B it seems that FS considers it as 2 distinct conferences, or maybe I wrongly set any configuration ? Thanks
They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically. The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement. Regards, João Mesquita On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
If I have a conference created on node A with name abc-domain@default and another with the same name in node B it seems that FS considers it as 2 distinct conferences, or maybe I wrongly set any configuration ?
Thanks
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
ha ok, any example to listening conference with ESL ? are bridge 2 conferences made the same way as 2 users ? suggestion: as there is one DB with ODBC for all nodes why not create a conference table as sip_registration to manage the ip of every first user in a conference and redirect the other automatically to the right node ? Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 11:08 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically. The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement. Regards, João Mesquita On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: If I have a conference created on node A with name abc-domain@default and another with the same name in node B it seems that FS considers it as 2 distinct conferences, or maybe I wrongly set any configuration ? Thanks _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Can this be done with the primary database sqlite ? Regds Sam On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
ha ok, any example to listening conference with ESL ? are bridge 2 conferences made the same way as 2 users ?
suggestion: as there is one DB with ODBC for all nodes why not create a conference table as sip_registration to manage the ip of every first user in a conference and redirect the other automatically to the right node ?
Thanks
----- Original Message ----- *From:* João Mesquita <jmesquita@freeswitch.org> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> *Sent:* Monday, January 03, 2011 11:08 PM *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically.
The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement.
Regards, João Mesquita
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
If I have a conference created on node A with name abc-domain@default and another with the same name in node B it seems that FS considers it as 2 distinct conferences, or maybe I wrongly set any configuration ?
Thanks
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
------------------------------
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
The ESL implementation would be the same... On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Sam <u2nsam@gmail.com> wrote:
Can this be done with the primary database sqlite ?
Regds Sam
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
ha ok, any example to listening conference with ESL ? are bridge 2 conferences made the same way as 2 users ?
suggestion: as there is one DB with ODBC for all nodes why not create a conference table as sip_registration to manage the ip of every first user in a conference and redirect the other automatically to the right node ?
Thanks
----- Original Message ----- *From:* João Mesquita <jmesquita@freeswitch.org> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> *Sent:* Monday, January 03, 2011 11:08 PM *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically.
The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement.
Regards, João Mesquita
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
If I have a conference created on node A with name abc-domain@default and another with the same name in node B it seems that FS considers it as 2 distinct conferences, or maybe I wrongly set any configuration ?
Thanks
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
------------------------------
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
This is a feature that has not been implemented, it has nothing to do with not being possible or not wanted. Patches or bounties should be accepted if any of you is willing to implement the feature. Regards, João Mesquita On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Avi Marcus <Avi@amarcus.com> wrote:
The ESL implementation would be the same...
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Sam <u2nsam@gmail.com> wrote:
Can this be done with the primary database sqlite ?
Regds Sam
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
ha ok, any example to listening conference with ESL ? are bridge 2 conferences made the same way as 2 users ?
suggestion: as there is one DB with ODBC for all nodes why not create a conference table as sip_registration to manage the ip of every first user in a conference and redirect the other automatically to the right node ?
Thanks
----- Original Message ----- *From:* João Mesquita <jmesquita@freeswitch.org> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> *Sent:* Monday, January 03, 2011 11:08 PM *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically.
The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement.
Regards, João Mesquita
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
If I have a conference created on node A with name abc-domain@default and another with the same name in node B it seems that FS considers it as 2 distinct conferences, or maybe I wrongly set any configuration ?
Thanks
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
------------------------------
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Ok, I need to learn more C language so ;)... ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 8:19 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC This is a feature that has not been implemented, it has nothing to do with not being possible or not wanted. Patches or bounties should be accepted if any of you is willing to implement the feature. Regards, João Mesquita On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Avi Marcus <Avi@amarcus.com> wrote: The ESL implementation would be the same... On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Sam <u2nsam@gmail.com> wrote: Can this be done with the primary database sqlite ? Regds Sam On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: ha ok, any example to listening conference with ESL ? are bridge 2 conferences made the same way as 2 users ? suggestion: as there is one DB with ODBC for all nodes why not create a conference table as sip_registration to manage the ip of every first user in a conference and redirect the other automatically to the right node ? Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 11:08 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically. The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement. Regards, João Mesquita On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: If I have a conference created on node A with name abc-domain@default and another with the same name in node B it seems that FS considers it as 2 distinct conferences, or maybe I wrongly set any configuration ? Thanks _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
and I created a bounty, thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 8:19 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC This is a feature that has not been implemented, it has nothing to do with not being possible or not wanted. Patches or bounties should be accepted if any of you is willing to implement the feature. Regards, João Mesquita On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Avi Marcus <Avi@amarcus.com> wrote: The ESL implementation would be the same... On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Sam <u2nsam@gmail.com> wrote: Can this be done with the primary database sqlite ? Regds Sam On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: ha ok, any example to listening conference with ESL ? are bridge 2 conferences made the same way as 2 users ? suggestion: as there is one DB with ODBC for all nodes why not create a conference table as sip_registration to manage the ip of every first user in a conference and redirect the other automatically to the right node ? Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 11:08 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically. The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement. Regards, João Mesquita On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: If I have a conference created on node A with name abc-domain@default and another with the same name in node B it seems that FS considers it as 2 distinct conferences, or maybe I wrongly set any configuration ? Thanks _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Would you please explain how to bridge two conference in different servers together? I tried the uuid_bridge and uuid_transfer, but it doesn't work. I could only use "originate sofia/gateway/gateway_name/extension" to bridge, but I don't want the dailing appear. Beside, I want to know that how to bridge two conference in the same server together. I could use "conference cof_name transfer" to bridge, but when I bridge the members in conference B to conference A, the conference B will be destroyed. So I can not transfer the original conference B members back. Sincerely yours, thisjoy. 2011/1/4 João Mesquita <jmesquita@freeswitch.org>
They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically.
The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement.
Regards, João Mesquita
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 AM, joy this <thisjoy0528@gmail.com> wrote:
Would you please explain how to bridge two conference in different servers together? I tried the uuid_bridge and uuid_transfer, but it doesn't work. I could only use "originate sofia/gateway/gateway_name/extension" to bridge, but I don't want the dailing appear.
Beside, I want to know that how to bridge two conference in the same server together. I could use "conference cof_name transfer" to bridge, but when I bridge the members in conference B to conference A, the conference B will be destroyed. So I can not transfer the original conference B members back.
Sincerely yours, thisjoy.
2011/1/4 João Mesquita <jmesquita@freeswitch.org>
They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no
implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically.
The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement.
Regards, João Mesquita
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- -Rupa
Out of interest rupa, how are conference commands such as relate implemented during a conf-conf bridge? For instance when specifying member A on FS1 should be heard by member B on FS2 but not by member C on FS2? I'm guessing it's only possible on the same server, not across a cluster? -Steve On 5 January 2011 15:20, Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com> wrote:
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 AM, joy this <thisjoy0528@gmail.com> wrote:
Would you please explain how to bridge two conference in different servers together? I tried the uuid_bridge and uuid_transfer, but it doesn't work. I could only use "originate sofia/gateway/gateway_name/extension" to bridge, but I don't want the dailing appear.
Beside, I want to know that how to bridge two conference in the same server together. I could use "conference cof_name transfer" to bridge, but when I bridge the members in conference B to conference A, the conference B will be destroyed. So I can not transfer the original conference B members back.
Sincerely yours, thisjoy.
2011/1/4 João Mesquita <jmesquita@freeswitch.org>
They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically. The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement. Regards, João Mesquita
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- -Rupa
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Yes, Since there is only one voice channel between the servers, if you relate to that channel, everything from the other server will follow. /Peter -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] För Steven Ayre Skickat: den 5 januari 2011 16:27 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help Ämne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Out of interest rupa, how are conference commands such as relate implemented during a conf-conf bridge? For instance when specifying member A on FS1 should be heard by member B on FS2 but not by member C on FS2? I'm guessing it's only possible on the same server, not across a cluster? -Steve On 5 January 2011 15:20, Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com> wrote:
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 AM, joy this <thisjoy0528@gmail.com> wrote:
Would you please explain how to bridge two conference in different servers together? I tried the uuid_bridge and uuid_transfer, but it doesn't work. I could only use "originate sofia/gateway/gateway_name/extension" to bridge, but I don't want the dailing appear.
Beside, I want to know that how to bridge two conference in the same server together. I could use "conference cof_name transfer" to bridge, but when I bridge the members in conference B to conference A, the conference B will be destroyed. So I can not transfer the original conference B members back.
Sincerely yours, thisjoy.
2011/1/4 João Mesquita <jmesquita@freeswitch.org>
They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically. The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement. Regards, João Mesquita
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- -Rupa
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org !DSPAM:4d248eeb32762038977453!
Thats interesting ... need to try it ! Regards Sam On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com> wrote:
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]]
To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 AM, joy this <thisjoy0528@gmail.com> wrote:
Would you please explain how to bridge two conference in different servers together? I tried the uuid_bridge and uuid_transfer, but it doesn't work. I could only use "originate sofia/gateway/gateway_name/extension" to bridge, but I don't want the dailing appear.
Beside, I want to know that how to bridge two conference in the same server together. I could use "conference cof_name transfer" to bridge, but when I bridge the members in conference B to conference A, the conference B will be destroyed. So I can not transfer the original conference B members back.
Sincerely yours, thisjoy.
2011/1/4 João Mesquita <jmesquita@freeswitch.org>
They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no
implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically.
The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement.
Regards, João Mesquita
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- -Rupa
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] so destination is the name of the conference on server 2 ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Sam To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Thats interesting ... need to try it ! Regards Sam On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com> wrote: Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 AM, joy this <thisjoy0528@gmail.com> wrote: Would you please explain how to bridge two conference in different servers together? I tried the uuid_bridge and uuid_transfer, but it doesn't work. I could only use "originate sofia/gateway/gateway_name/extension" to bridge, but I don't want the dailing appear. Beside, I want to know that how to bridge two conference in the same server together. I could use "conference cof_name transfer" to bridge, but when I bridge the members in conference B to conference A, the conference B will be destroyed. So I can not transfer the original conference B members back. Sincerely yours, thisjoy. 2011/1/4 João Mesquita <jmesquita@freeswitch.org> They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically. The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement. Regards, João Mesquita _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- -Rupa _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
The destination can be whatever, as long as you handle that destination in the dialplan on the destination FS server. It will end up as a normal call, and then be parsed by the dialplan. /Peter ________________________________________ Från: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] för Madovsky [infos@madovsky.org] Skickat: den 5 januari 2011 17:37 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help Ämne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] so destination is the name of the conference on server 2 ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Sam<mailto:u2nsam@gmail.com> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help<mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Thats interesting ... need to try it ! Regards Sam On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com<mailto:rupa@rupa.com>> wrote: Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 AM, joy this <thisjoy0528@gmail.com<mailto:thisjoy0528@gmail.com>> wrote: Would you please explain how to bridge two conference in different servers together? I tried the uuid_bridge and uuid_transfer, but it doesn't work. I could only use "originate sofia/gateway/gateway_name/extension" to bridge, but I don't want the dailing appear. Beside, I want to know that how to bridge two conference in the same server together. I could use "conference cof_name transfer" to bridge, but when I bridge the members in conference B to conference A, the conference B will be destroyed. So I can not transfer the original conference B members back. Sincerely yours, thisjoy. 2011/1/4 João Mesquita <jmesquita@freeswitch.org<mailto:jmesquita@freeswitch.org>> They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically. The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement. Regards, João Mesquita _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- -Rupa _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ________________________________ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org !DSPAM:4d249f7b32761448239528!
haaaa ok, understood :D ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Olsson" <peter.olsson@visionutveckling.se> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:49 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC The destination can be whatever, as long as you handle that destination in the dialplan on the destination FS server. It will end up as a normal call, and then be parsed by the dialplan. /Peter ________________________________________ Från: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] för Madovsky [infos@madovsky.org] Skickat: den 5 januari 2011 17:37 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help Ämne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] so destination is the name of the conference on server 2 ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Sam<mailto:u2nsam@gmail.com> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help<mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Thats interesting ... need to try it ! Regards Sam On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com<mailto:rupa@rupa.com>> wrote: Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 AM, joy this <thisjoy0528@gmail.com<mailto:thisjoy0528@gmail.com>> wrote: Would you please explain how to bridge two conference in different servers together? I tried the uuid_bridge and uuid_transfer, but it doesn't work. I could only use "originate sofia/gateway/gateway_name/extension" to bridge, but I don't want the dailing appear. Beside, I want to know that how to bridge two conference in the same server together. I could use "conference cof_name transfer" to bridge, but when I bridge the members in conference B to conference A, the conference B will be destroyed. So I can not transfer the original conference B members back. Sincerely yours, thisjoy. 2011/1/4 João Mesquita <jmesquita@freeswitch.org<mailto:jmesquita@freeswitch.org>> They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically. The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement. Regards, João Mesquita _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- -Rupa _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ________________________________ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org !DSPAM:4d249f7b32761448239528! _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
I really don't know how to detect with ESL if there is a conference with same name on different nodes, it should be a common point like DB or other no ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Olsson" <peter.olsson@visionutveckling.se> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:49 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC The destination can be whatever, as long as you handle that destination in the dialplan on the destination FS server. It will end up as a normal call, and then be parsed by the dialplan. /Peter ________________________________________ Från: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] för Madovsky [infos@madovsky.org] Skickat: den 5 januari 2011 17:37 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help Ämne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] so destination is the name of the conference on server 2 ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Sam<mailto:u2nsam@gmail.com> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help<mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Thats interesting ... need to try it ! Regards Sam On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com<mailto:rupa@rupa.com>> wrote: Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 AM, joy this <thisjoy0528@gmail.com<mailto:thisjoy0528@gmail.com>> wrote: Would you please explain how to bridge two conference in different servers together? I tried the uuid_bridge and uuid_transfer, but it doesn't work. I could only use "originate sofia/gateway/gateway_name/extension" to bridge, but I don't want the dailing appear. Beside, I want to know that how to bridge two conference in the same server together. I could use "conference cof_name transfer" to bridge, but when I bridge the members in conference B to conference A, the conference B will be destroyed. So I can not transfer the original conference B members back. Sincerely yours, thisjoy. 2011/1/4 João Mesquita <jmesquita@freeswitch.org<mailto:jmesquita@freeswitch.org>> They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically. The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement. Regards, João Mesquita _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- -Rupa _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ________________________________ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org !DSPAM:4d249f7b32761448239528! _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Have you ever used esl? You can use the Action: add-member header in conjunction with the Conference-Size: 1 header to know that a conference has been created. Based on that, it is pretty straightforward. Regards, João Mesquita On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
I really don't know how to detect with ESL if there is a conference with same name on different nodes, it should be a common point like DB or other no ?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Olsson" <peter.olsson@visionutveckling.se> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:49 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
The destination can be whatever, as long as you handle that destination in the dialplan on the destination FS server. It will end up as a normal call, and then be parsed by the dialplan.
/Peter ________________________________________ Från: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] för Madovsky [infos@madovsky.org] Skickat: den 5 januari 2011 17:37 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help Ämne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] so destination is the name of the conference on server 2 ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Sam<mailto:u2nsam@gmail.com> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help<mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Thats interesting ... need to try it !
Regards Sam
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com<mailto:rupa@rupa.com>> wrote: Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]]
To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 AM, joy this <thisjoy0528@gmail.com<mailto:thisjoy0528@gmail.com>> wrote: Would you please explain how to bridge two conference in different servers together? I tried the uuid_bridge and uuid_transfer, but it doesn't work. I could only use "originate sofia/gateway/gateway_name/extension" to bridge, but I don't want the dailing appear.
Beside, I want to know that how to bridge two conference in the same server together. I could use "conference cof_name transfer" to bridge, but when I bridge the members in conference B to conference A, the conference B will be destroyed. So I can not transfer the original conference B members back.
Sincerely yours, thisjoy.
2011/1/4 João Mesquita <jmesquita@freeswitch.org<mailto:jmesquita@freeswitch.org>>
They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically.
The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement.
Regards, João Mesquita
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org<mailto: FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- -Rupa
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org<mailto: FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
________________________________
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org !DSPAM:4d249f7b32761448239528!
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Not, never, it's like a chimere for me ;) ok I will try Obrigado ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 6:20 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Have you ever used esl? You can use the Action: add-member header in conjunction with the Conference-Size: 1 header to know that a conference has been created. Based on that, it is pretty straightforward. Regards, João Mesquita On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: I really don't know how to detect with ESL if there is a conference with same name on different nodes, it should be a common point like DB or other no ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Olsson" <peter.olsson@visionutveckling.se> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:49 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC The destination can be whatever, as long as you handle that destination in the dialplan on the destination FS server. It will end up as a normal call, and then be parsed by the dialplan. /Peter ________________________________________ Från: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] för Madovsky [infos@madovsky.org] Skickat: den 5 januari 2011 17:37 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help Ämne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC > Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string > options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> > [<callerid_name>]] so destination is the name of the conference on server 2 ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Sam<mailto:u2nsam@gmail.com> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help<mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Thats interesting ... need to try it ! Regards Sam On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com<mailto:rupa@rupa.com>> wrote: Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 AM, joy this <thisjoy0528@gmail.com<mailto:thisjoy0528@gmail.com>> wrote: Would you please explain how to bridge two conference in different servers together? I tried the uuid_bridge and uuid_transfer, but it doesn't work. I could only use "originate sofia/gateway/gateway_name/extension" to bridge, but I don't want the dailing appear. Beside, I want to know that how to bridge two conference in the same server together. I could use "conference cof_name transfer" to bridge, but when I bridge the members in conference B to conference A, the conference B will be destroyed. So I can not transfer the original conference B members back. Sincerely yours, thisjoy. 2011/1/4 João Mesquita <jmesquita@freeswitch.org<mailto:jmesquita@freeswitch.org>> They are indeed 2 completely different conferences. There's no implementation of making these 2 conferences bridge themselves automatically. The way I have solved this problem for now is have an ESL daemon "listening" on the conference creation events and bridging the 2 servers together when the one with the same name on the same domain is created. This solution might work for you and it's no too hard to implement. Regards, João Mesquita _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- -Rupa _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ________________________________ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org !DSPAM:4d249f7b32761448239528! _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
It works. Thank you everyone. 2011/1/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com>
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]]
To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers.
in case of you have 8 servers you have to do it for each ? Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: joy this To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:51 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC It works. Thank you everyone. 2011/1/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com> Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Yes On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
in case of you have 8 servers you have to do it for each ?
Thanks
----- Original Message ----- From: joy this To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:51 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC It works. Thank you everyone.
2011/1/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com>
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers.
________________________________
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- -Rupa
Rupa, I don't want bother anyone with this thread but why not to manage conference as SIP user ? if someone from server A call an other who is registered on server B, so FS do it automatically, why not with conference ? Or maybe create a param in mod_conference that let the choice of the admin to manage unique name in all cluster or not. like <param name="cluster_unique_name" value="true"/> I will try to understand the C code to hack something like this... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rupa Schomaker" <rupa@rupa.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Yes On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
in case of you have 8 servers you have to do it for each ?
Thanks
----- Original Message ----- From: joy this To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:51 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC It works. Thank you everyone.
2011/1/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com>
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers.
________________________________
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- -Rupa _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Ok, let me see if I can get this into your head. (giggles) A conference means that the audio needs to mixed in together so that all participants can talk/hear each other, right? If you implement something in C on mod_conference, you are going to essentially do the same as what an ESL app does. You _need_ to call in from one server to the other so that you can mix the audio of all the participants. The real advantage would be the management API being only one for everything and the challenge is exactly that. How to mute certain users on a conference that is spanning over 10 servers or deaf them, etc... A SIP "user" is easier because you don't have to bridge audio from another server necessarily. Got it? Regards, João Mesquita On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
Rupa,
I don't want bother anyone with this thread but why not to manage conference as SIP user ? if someone from server A call an other who is registered on server B, so FS do it automatically, why not with conference ? Or maybe create a param in mod_conference that let the choice of the admin to manage unique name in all cluster or not. like <param name="cluster_unique_name" value="true"/> I will try to understand the C code to hack something like this...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rupa Schomaker" <rupa@rupa.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Yes
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
in case of you have 8 servers you have to do it for each ?
Thanks
----- Original Message ----- From: joy this To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:51 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC It works. Thank you everyone.
2011/1/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com>
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers.
________________________________
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- -Rupa
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
I got it thanks, but do you think it would be more interesting to reduce bandwidth and latency between nodes and centralize the conference on one node only by transferring the incoming user to the right node ? ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Ok, let me see if I can get this into your head. (giggles) A conference means that the audio needs to mixed in together so that all participants can talk/hear each other, right? If you implement something in C on mod_conference, you are going to essentially do the same as what an ESL app does. You _need_ to call in from one server to the other so that you can mix the audio of all the participants. The real advantage would be the management API being only one for everything and the challenge is exactly that. How to mute certain users on a conference that is spanning over 10 servers or deaf them, etc... A SIP "user" is easier because you don't have to bridge audio from another server necessarily. Got it? Regards, João Mesquita On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: Rupa, I don't want bother anyone with this thread but why not to manage conference as SIP user ? if someone from server A call an other who is registered on server B, so FS do it automatically, why not with conference ? Or maybe create a param in mod_conference that let the choice of the admin to manage unique name in all cluster or not. like <param name="cluster_unique_name" value="true"/> I will try to understand the C code to hack something like this... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rupa Schomaker" <rupa@rupa.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Yes On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: > in case of you have 8 servers you have to do it for each ? > > Thanks > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: joy this > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:51 AM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC > It works. Thank you everyone. > > 2011/1/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com> >> >> Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string >> options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> >> [<callerid_name>]] >> To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a >> corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it >> into >> the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in >> the >> two servers. > > ________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- -Rupa _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Just an idea..soon I will have to put people that are answered on multiple servers into the same conference. I am thinking about having a table on the central SQLServer like this: ConferenceName, ServerName. . I would lookup the server a particular conference is on and then transfer the caller to that server and extension that will put the caller into the appropriate conference (dial something..@SERVER)- I guess. I've seen the export word that maybe the way to pass on variables to the other server such as the ConferenceName, UserName Then the server hosting the conference will have an extension that has the forums profile and controls <action application="conference" data="${ConferenceName}@forums"/> That way all the users are in the same conference and can be controlled there instead of having only one link to a bunch of callers on another server. If you get it going, could you email the dial strings, extensions you used.etc.I am curious.. Kris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC I got it thanks, but do you think it would be more interesting to reduce bandwidth and latency between nodes and centralize the conference on one node only by transferring the incoming user to the right node ? ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Ok, let me see if I can get this into your head. (giggles) A conference means that the audio needs to mixed in together so that all participants can talk/hear each other, right? If you implement something in C on mod_conference, you are going to essentially do the same as what an ESL app does. You _need_ to call in from one server to the other so that you can mix the audio of all the participants. The real advantage would be the management API being only one for everything and the challenge is exactly that. How to mute certain users on a conference that is spanning over 10 servers or deaf them, etc... A SIP "user" is easier because you don't have to bridge audio from another server necessarily. Got it? Regards, João Mesquita On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: Rupa, I don't want bother anyone with this thread but why not to manage conference as SIP user ? if someone from server A call an other who is registered on server B, so FS do it automatically, why not with conference ? Or maybe create a param in mod_conference that let the choice of the admin to manage unique name in all cluster or not. like <param name="cluster_unique_name" value="true"/> I will try to understand the C code to hack something like this... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rupa Schomaker" <rupa@rupa.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Yes On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: > in case of you have 8 servers you have to do it for each ? > > Thanks > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: joy this > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:51 AM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC > It works. Thank you everyone. > > 2011/1/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com> >> >> Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string >> options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> >> [<callerid_name>]] >> To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a >> corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it >> into >> the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in >> the >> two servers. > > ________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- -Rupa _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Even tho both of your approaches are good for a "small" scale system, I think we are missing the point here. If you don't need to have several conferences bridged because you don't lack machine power to hold the conference onto one server, you can use ESL to make an INVITE and then a REPLACES. If I am not mistaken, you are able to use the uuid_simplify command to make the replaces after the bridge is done. Although, most people looking to have multiple conferences on multiple servers are looking for scalability where you can have one single (or multiple) conferences spread over several boxes that can even be geographically spread out look like a single conference to the user and/or systems involved. This is the real challenge and that might be worth thinking about hacking C, the rest is just dialplan and a bit of ESL to make the control. The first one is way out of my league. João Mesquita On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Kris <kris@livecall.com> wrote:
Just an idea..soon I will have to put people that are answered on multiple servers into the same conference. I am thinking about having a table on the central SQLServer like this: ConferenceName, ServerName. . I would lookup the server a particular conference is on and then transfer the caller to that server and extension that will put the caller into the appropriate conference (dial something..@SERVER)- I guess. I've seen the export word that maybe the way to pass on variables to the other server such as the ConferenceName, UserName
Then the server hosting the conference will have an extension that has the forums profile and controls <action application="conference" data="${ConferenceName}@forums"/> That way all the users are in the same conference and can be controlled there instead of having only one link to a bunch of callers on another server.
If you get it going, could you email the dial strings, extensions you used.etc.I am curious.. Kris
----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
I got it thanks, but do you think it would be more interesting to reduce bandwidth and latency between nodes and centralize the conference on one node only by transferring the incoming user to the right node ? ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Ok, let me see if I can get this into your head. (giggles)
A conference means that the audio needs to mixed in together so that all participants can talk/hear each other, right? If you implement something in C on mod_conference, you are going to essentially do the same as what an ESL app does. You _need_ to call in from one server to the other so that you can mix the audio of all the participants. The real advantage would be the management API being only one for everything and the challenge is exactly that. How to mute certain users on a conference that is spanning over 10 servers or deaf them, etc...
A SIP "user" is easier because you don't have to bridge audio from another server necessarily. Got it?
Regards, João Mesquita
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
Rupa,
I don't want bother anyone with this thread but why not to manage conference as SIP user ? if someone from server A call an other who is registered on server B, so FS do it automatically, why not with conference ? Or maybe create a param in mod_conference that let the choice of the admin to manage unique name in all cluster or not. like <param name="cluster_unique_name" value="true"/> I will try to understand the C code to hack something like this...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rupa Schomaker" <rupa@rupa.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Yes
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
in case of you have 8 servers you have to do it for each ?
Thanks
----- Original Message ----- From: joy this To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:51 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC It works. Thank you everyone.
2011/1/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com>
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add
it
into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers.
________________________________
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
-- -Rupa
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
If I create an ESL deamon with for example Perl, it means that every event from FS will be sent to this daemon so I only need to catch the right ones and do the job ? Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 5:29 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Even tho both of your approaches are good for a "small" scale system, I think we are missing the point here. If you don't need to have several conferences bridged because you don't lack machine power to hold the conference onto one server, you can use ESL to make an INVITE and then a REPLACES. If I am not mistaken, you are able to use the uuid_simplify command to make the replaces after the bridge is done. Although, most people looking to have multiple conferences on multiple servers are looking for scalability where you can have one single (or multiple) conferences spread over several boxes that can even be geographically spread out look like a single conference to the user and/or systems involved. This is the real challenge and that might be worth thinking about hacking C, the rest is just dialplan and a bit of ESL to make the control. The first one is way out of my league. João Mesquita On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Kris <kris@livecall.com> wrote: Just an idea..soon I will have to put people that are answered on multiple servers into the same conference. I am thinking about having a table on the central SQLServer like this: ConferenceName, ServerName. . I would lookup the server a particular conference is on and then transfer the caller to that server and extension that will put the caller into the appropriate conference (dial something..@SERVER)- I guess. I've seen the export word that maybe the way to pass on variables to the other server such as the ConferenceName, UserName Then the server hosting the conference will have an extension that has the forums profile and controls <action application="conference" data="${ConferenceName}@forums"/> That way all the users are in the same conference and can be controlled there instead of having only one link to a bunch of callers on another server. If you get it going, could you email the dial strings, extensions you used.etc.I am curious.. Kris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC I got it thanks, but do you think it would be more interesting to reduce bandwidth and latency between nodes and centralize the conference on one node only by transferring the incoming user to the right node ? ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Ok, let me see if I can get this into your head. (giggles) A conference means that the audio needs to mixed in together so that all participants can talk/hear each other, right? If you implement something in C on mod_conference, you are going to essentially do the same as what an ESL app does. You _need_ to call in from one server to the other so that you can mix the audio of all the participants. The real advantage would be the management API being only one for everything and the challenge is exactly that. How to mute certain users on a conference that is spanning over 10 servers or deaf them, etc... A SIP "user" is easier because you don't have to bridge audio from another server necessarily. Got it? Regards, João Mesquita On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: Rupa, I don't want bother anyone with this thread but why not to manage conference as SIP user ? if someone from server A call an other who is registered on server B, so FS do it automatically, why not with conference ? Or maybe create a param in mod_conference that let the choice of the admin to manage unique name in all cluster or not. like <param name="cluster_unique_name" value="true"/> I will try to understand the C code to hack something like this... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rupa Schomaker" <rupa@rupa.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Yes On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: > in case of you have 8 servers you have to do it for each ? > > Thanks > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: joy this > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:51 AM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC > It works. Thank you everyone. > > 2011/1/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com> >> >> Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string >> options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> >> [<callerid_name>]] >> To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a >> corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it >> into >> the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in >> the >> two servers. > > ________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- -Rupa _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Yes, you got the hang of it. Regards, João Mesquita On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
If I create an ESL deamon with for example Perl, it means that every event from FS will be sent to this daemon so I only need to catch the right ones and do the job ?
Thanks
----- Original Message ----- *From:* João Mesquita <jmesquita@freeswitch.org> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> *Sent:* Friday, January 07, 2011 5:29 PM *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Even tho both of your approaches are good for a "small" scale system, I think we are missing the point here.
If you don't need to have several conferences bridged because you don't lack machine power to hold the conference onto one server, you can use ESL to make an INVITE and then a REPLACES. If I am not mistaken, you are able to use the uuid_simplify command to make the replaces after the bridge is done. Although, most people looking to have multiple conferences on multiple servers are looking for scalability where you can have one single (or multiple) conferences spread over several boxes that can even be geographically spread out look like a single conference to the user and/or systems involved.
This is the real challenge and that might be worth thinking about hacking C, the rest is just dialplan and a bit of ESL to make the control. The first one is way out of my league.
João Mesquita
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Kris <kris@livecall.com> wrote:
Just an idea..soon I will have to put people that are answered on multiple servers into the same conference. I am thinking about having a table on the central SQLServer like this: ConferenceName, ServerName. . I would lookup the server a particular conference is on and then transfer the caller to that server and extension that will put the caller into the appropriate conference (dial something..@SERVER)- I guess. I've seen the export word that maybe the way to pass on variables to the other server such as the ConferenceName, UserName
Then the server hosting the conference will have an extension that has the forums profile and controls <action application="conference" data="${ConferenceName}@forums"/> That way all the users are in the same conference and can be controlled there instead of having only one link to a bunch of callers on another server.
If you get it going, could you email the dial strings, extensions you used.etc.I am curious.. Kris
----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
I got it thanks, but do you think it would be more interesting to reduce bandwidth and latency between nodes and centralize the conference on one node only by transferring the incoming user to the right node ? ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Ok, let me see if I can get this into your head. (giggles)
A conference means that the audio needs to mixed in together so that all participants can talk/hear each other, right? If you implement something in C on mod_conference, you are going to essentially do the same as what an ESL app does. You _need_ to call in from one server to the other so that you can mix the audio of all the participants. The real advantage would be the management API being only one for everything and the challenge is exactly that. How to mute certain users on a conference that is spanning over 10 servers or deaf them, etc...
A SIP "user" is easier because you don't have to bridge audio from another server necessarily. Got it?
Regards, João Mesquita
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
Rupa,
I don't want bother anyone with this thread but why not to manage conference as SIP user ? if someone from server A call an other who is registered on server B, so FS do it automatically, why not with conference ? Or maybe create a param in mod_conference that let the choice of the admin to manage unique name in all cluster or not. like <param name="cluster_unique_name" value="true"/> I will try to understand the C code to hack something like this...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rupa Schomaker" <rupa@rupa.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Yes
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
in case of you have 8 servers you have to do it for each ?
Thanks
----- Original Message ----- From: joy this To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:51 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC It works. Thank you everyone.
2011/1/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com>
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add
it
into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers.
________________________________
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
-- -Rupa
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
------------------------------
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
it's what I thought first, but Joao is not hot for that apparently. for now I had another idea as I don't want to spread the same conference in several servers. Franck ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kris" <kris@livecall.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 4:43 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Just an idea..soon I will have to put people that are answered on multiple servers into the same conference. I am thinking about having a table on the central SQLServer like this: ConferenceName, ServerName. . I would lookup the server a particular conference is on and then transfer the caller to that server and extension that will put the caller into the appropriate conference (dial something..@SERVER)- I guess. I've seen the export word that maybe the way to pass on variables to the other server such as the ConferenceName, UserName Then the server hosting the conference will have an extension that has the forums profile and controls <action application="conference" data="${ConferenceName}@forums"/> That way all the users are in the same conference and can be controlled there instead of having only one link to a bunch of callers on another server. If you get it going, could you email the dial strings, extensions you used.etc.I am curious.. Kris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC I got it thanks, but do you think it would be more interesting to reduce bandwidth and latency between nodes and centralize the conference on one node only by transferring the incoming user to the right node ? ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Ok, let me see if I can get this into your head. (giggles) A conference means that the audio needs to mixed in together so that all participants can talk/hear each other, right? If you implement something in C on mod_conference, you are going to essentially do the same as what an ESL app does. You _need_ to call in from one server to the other so that you can mix the audio of all the participants. The real advantage would be the management API being only one for everything and the challenge is exactly that. How to mute certain users on a conference that is spanning over 10 servers or deaf them, etc... A SIP "user" is easier because you don't have to bridge audio from another server necessarily. Got it? Regards, João Mesquita On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: Rupa, I don't want bother anyone with this thread but why not to manage conference as SIP user ? if someone from server A call an other who is registered on server B, so FS do it automatically, why not with conference ? Or maybe create a param in mod_conference that let the choice of the admin to manage unique name in all cluster or not. like <param name="cluster_unique_name" value="true"/> I will try to understand the C code to hack something like this... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rupa Schomaker" <rupa@rupa.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Yes On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: > in case of you have 8 servers you have to do it for each ? > > Thanks > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: joy this > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:51 AM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC > It works. Thank you everyone. > > 2011/1/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com> >> >> Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string >> options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> >> [<callerid_name>]] >> To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a >> corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it >> into >> the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in >> the >> two servers. > > ________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- -Rupa _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
On second thought, Joao may be right. If the conference is spread accross 10 servers, and one crashes, it keeps the other users chatting. A->B->C->D->A. C crashes, the conference on B has to become aware, and immediately connect to D. I don't know if such failover exists in mod_conference or even if having conferences circularly linked would cause a feedback. If they are circularly linked and only one fails, it should still work even without failover. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 3:31 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC it's what I thought first, but Joao is not hot for that apparently. for now I had another idea as I don't want to spread the same conference in several servers. Franck ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kris" <kris@livecall.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 4:43 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Just an idea..soon I will have to put people that are answered on multiple servers into the same conference. I am thinking about having a table on the central SQLServer like this: ConferenceName, ServerName. . I would lookup the server a particular conference is on and then transfer the caller to that server and extension that will put the caller into the appropriate conference (dial something..@SERVER)- I guess. I've seen the export word that maybe the way to pass on variables to the other server such as the ConferenceName, UserName Then the server hosting the conference will have an extension that has the forums profile and controls <action application="conference" data="${ConferenceName}@forums"/> That way all the users are in the same conference and can be controlled there instead of having only one link to a bunch of callers on another server. If you get it going, could you email the dial strings, extensions you used.etc.I am curious.. Kris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC I got it thanks, but do you think it would be more interesting to reduce bandwidth and latency between nodes and centralize the conference on one node only by transferring the incoming user to the right node ? ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Ok, let me see if I can get this into your head. (giggles) A conference means that the audio needs to mixed in together so that all participants can talk/hear each other, right? If you implement something in C on mod_conference, you are going to essentially do the same as what an ESL app does. You _need_ to call in from one server to the other so that you can mix the audio of all the participants. The real advantage would be the management API being only one for everything and the challenge is exactly that. How to mute certain users on a conference that is spanning over 10 servers or deaf them, etc... A SIP "user" is easier because you don't have to bridge audio from another server necessarily. Got it? Regards, João Mesquita On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: Rupa, I don't want bother anyone with this thread but why not to manage conference as SIP user ? if someone from server A call an other who is registered on server B, so FS do it automatically, why not with conference ? Or maybe create a param in mod_conference that let the choice of the admin to manage unique name in all cluster or not. like <param name="cluster_unique_name" value="true"/> I will try to understand the C code to hack something like this... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rupa Schomaker" <rupa@rupa.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC Yes On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote: > in case of you have 8 servers you have to do it for each ? > > Thanks > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: joy this > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:51 AM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC > It works. Thank you everyone. > > 2011/1/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com> >> >> Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string >> options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> >> [<callerid_name>]] >> To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a >> corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add it >> into >> the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in >> the >> two servers. > > ________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- -Rupa _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
I don't know if such failover exists in mod_conference
I think Sofia recover would handle that
if having conferences circularly linked would cause a feedback
I think it would Steve on iPhone On 8 Jan 2011, at 13:37, "Kris" <kris@livecall.com> wrote:
On second thought, Joao may be right. If the conference is spread accross 10 servers, and one crashes, it keeps the other users chatting. A->B->C->D->A. C crashes, the conference on B has to become aware, and immediately connect to D. I don't know if such failover exists in mod_conference or even if having conferences circularly linked would cause a feedback. If they are circularly linked and only one fails, it should still work even without failover.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 3:31 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
it's what I thought first, but Joao is not hot for that apparently. for now I had another idea as I don't want to spread the same conference in several servers.
Franck
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kris" <kris@livecall.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 4:43 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Just an idea..soon I will have to put people that are answered on multiple servers into the same conference. I am thinking about having a table on the central SQLServer like this: ConferenceName, ServerName. . I would lookup the server a particular conference is on and then transfer the caller to that server and extension that will put the caller into the appropriate conference (dial something..@SERVER)- I guess. I've seen the export word that maybe the way to pass on variables to the other server such as the ConferenceName, UserName
Then the server hosting the conference will have an extension that has the forums profile and controls <action application="conference" data="${ConferenceName}@forums"/> That way all the users are in the same conference and can be controlled there instead of having only one link to a bunch of callers on another server.
If you get it going, could you email the dial strings, extensions you used.etc.I am curious.. Kris
----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
I got it thanks, but do you think it would be more interesting to reduce bandwidth and latency between nodes and centralize the conference on one node only by transferring the incoming user to the right node ? ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Ok, let me see if I can get this into your head. (giggles)
A conference means that the audio needs to mixed in together so that all participants can talk/hear each other, right? If you implement something in C on mod_conference, you are going to essentially do the same as what an ESL app does. You _need_ to call in from one server to the other so that you can mix the audio of all the participants. The real advantage would be the management API being only one for everything and the challenge is exactly that. How to mute certain users on a conference that is spanning over 10 servers or deaf them, etc...
A SIP "user" is easier because you don't have to bridge audio from another server necessarily. Got it?
Regards, João Mesquita
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
Rupa,
I don't want bother anyone with this thread but why not to manage conference as SIP user ? if someone from server A call an other who is registered on server B, so FS do it automatically, why not with conference ? Or maybe create a param in mod_conference that let the choice of the admin to manage unique name in all cluster or not. like <param name="cluster_unique_name" value="true"/> I will try to understand the C code to hack something like this...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rupa Schomaker" <rupa@rupa.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Yes
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
in case of you have 8 servers you have to do it for each ?
Thanks
----- Original Message ----- From: joy this To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:51 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC It works. Thank you everyone.
2011/1/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com>
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add
it
into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers.
________________________________
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
-- -Rupa
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
I think circularly linked conferences cause echo. Daisy chained conferences have high latency, though are simple to build. On Jan 8, 2011, at 8:37, "Kris" <kris@livecall.com> wrote:
On second thought, Joao may be right. If the conference is spread accross 10 servers, and one crashes, it keeps the other users chatting. A->B->C->D->A. C crashes, the conference on B has to become aware, and immediately connect to D. I don't know if such failover exists in mod_conference or even if having conferences circularly linked would cause a feedback. If they are circularly linked and only one fails, it should still work even without failover.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 3:31 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
it's what I thought first, but Joao is not hot for that apparently. for now I had another idea as I don't want to spread the same conference in several servers.
Franck
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kris" <kris@livecall.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 4:43 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Just an idea..soon I will have to put people that are answered on multiple servers into the same conference. I am thinking about having a table on the central SQLServer like this: ConferenceName, ServerName. . I would lookup the server a particular conference is on and then transfer the caller to that server and extension that will put the caller into the appropriate conference (dial something..@SERVER)- I guess. I've seen the export word that maybe the way to pass on variables to the other server such as the ConferenceName, UserName
Then the server hosting the conference will have an extension that has the forums profile and controls <action application="conference" data="${ConferenceName}@forums"/> That way all the users are in the same conference and can be controlled there instead of having only one link to a bunch of callers on another server.
If you get it going, could you email the dial strings, extensions you used.etc.I am curious.. Kris
----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
I got it thanks, but do you think it would be more interesting to reduce bandwidth and latency between nodes and centralize the conference on one node only by transferring the incoming user to the right node ? ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Ok, let me see if I can get this into your head. (giggles)
A conference means that the audio needs to mixed in together so that all participants can talk/hear each other, right? If you implement something in C on mod_conference, you are going to essentially do the same as what an ESL app does. You _need_ to call in from one server to the other so that you can mix the audio of all the participants. The real advantage would be the management API being only one for everything and the challenge is exactly that. How to mute certain users on a conference that is spanning over 10 servers or deaf them, etc...
A SIP "user" is easier because you don't have to bridge audio from another server necessarily. Got it?
Regards, João Mesquita
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
Rupa,
I don't want bother anyone with this thread but why not to manage conference as SIP user ? if someone from server A call an other who is registered on server B, so FS do it automatically, why not with conference ? Or maybe create a param in mod_conference that let the choice of the admin to manage unique name in all cluster or not. like <param name="cluster_unique_name" value="true"/> I will try to understand the C code to hack something like this...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rupa Schomaker" <rupa@rupa.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Yes
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
in case of you have 8 servers you have to do it for each ?
Thanks
----- Original Message ----- From: joy this To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:51 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC It works. Thank you everyone.
2011/1/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com>
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add
it
into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers.
________________________________
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
-- -Rupa
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
for those who want a unique conference name on one node only, I use db application to insert the conference@node_ip when the first caller enters (but it depends your conference rules also) so when other callers are coming I check the db and compare the ip with the current node ip of the caller. if not the same I create a bridge to the conference (with audio codec with the same freq rate of the conference). if it's the same so I only put conference application in my dialplan. it's almost the same as Joao said unless you bridge a user to the conference and not a conference to another conference. hope this helps Regards Franck ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Rienzo" <cmrienzo@gmail.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Cc: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
I think circularly linked conferences cause echo. Daisy chained conferences have high latency, though are simple to build.
On Jan 8, 2011, at 8:37, "Kris" <kris@livecall.com> wrote:
On second thought, Joao may be right. If the conference is spread accross 10 servers, and one crashes, it keeps the other users chatting. A->B->C->D->A. C crashes, the conference on B has to become aware, and immediately connect to D. I don't know if such failover exists in mod_conference or even if having conferences circularly linked would cause a feedback. If they are circularly linked and only one fails, it should still work even without failover.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 3:31 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
it's what I thought first, but Joao is not hot for that apparently. for now I had another idea as I don't want to spread the same conference in several servers.
Franck
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kris" <kris@livecall.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 4:43 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Just an idea..soon I will have to put people that are answered on multiple servers into the same conference. I am thinking about having a table on the central SQLServer like this: ConferenceName, ServerName. . I would lookup the server a particular conference is on and then transfer the caller to that server and extension that will put the caller into the appropriate conference (dial something..@SERVER)- I guess. I've seen the export word that maybe the way to pass on variables to the other server such as the ConferenceName, UserName
Then the server hosting the conference will have an extension that has the forums profile and controls <action application="conference" data="${ConferenceName}@forums"/> That way all the users are in the same conference and can be controlled there instead of having only one link to a bunch of callers on another server.
If you get it going, could you email the dial strings, extensions you used.etc.I am curious.. Kris
----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
I got it thanks, but do you think it would be more interesting to reduce bandwidth and latency between nodes and centralize the conference on one node only by transferring the incoming user to the right node ? ----- Original Message ----- From: João Mesquita To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Ok, let me see if I can get this into your head. (giggles)
A conference means that the audio needs to mixed in together so that all participants can talk/hear each other, right? If you implement something in C on mod_conference, you are going to essentially do the same as what an ESL app does. You _need_ to call in from one server to the other so that you can mix the audio of all the participants. The real advantage would be the management API being only one for everything and the challenge is exactly that. How to mute certain users on a conference that is spanning over 10 servers or deaf them, etc...
A SIP "user" is easier because you don't have to bridge audio from another server necessarily. Got it?
Regards, João Mesquita
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
Rupa,
I don't want bother anyone with this thread but why not to manage conference as SIP user ? if someone from server A call an other who is registered on server B, so FS do it automatically, why not with conference ? Or maybe create a param in mod_conference that let the choice of the admin to manage unique name in all cluster or not. like <param name="cluster_unique_name" value="true"/> I will try to understand the C code to hack something like this...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rupa Schomaker" <rupa@rupa.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC
Yes
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
in case of you have 8 servers you have to do it for each ?
Thanks
----- Original Message ----- From: joy this To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:51 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference with cluster ODBC It works. Thank you everyone.
2011/1/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com>
Use the api: conference <confname> dial [{dial string options}]<endpoint_module_name>/<destination> [<callerid_number> [<callerid_name>]] To initiate the call from within conference A on server 1. Have a corresponding dialplan entry on server 2 to accept the call and add
it
into the conference A on server 2. You've now bridged the two conferences in the two servers.
________________________________
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
-- -Rupa
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
participants (10)
-
Avi Marcus
-
Chris Rienzo
-
joy this
-
João Mesquita
-
Kris
-
Madovsky
-
Peter Olsson
-
Rupa Schomaker
-
Sam
-
Steven Ayre