Hello Michael, Ahh, so I was looking the wrong direction for the translation (qsig -> sip) Thanks for your help! /Allan On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4497#section-8.4.4

480 Temporarily unavailable 18 No user responding

On Sep 1, 2016, at 5:03 PM, Allan Kristensen <ak@hejdu.dk> wrote:

Hello,

Why am I getting a (q850) NO_USER_RESPONSE (18) hangup cause from a SIP 480 Temp. unavail.

When the RFC 4497 says (pick one):

19 No answer from the user 480 Temporarily unavailable 20 Subscriber absent 480 Temporarily unavailable

I looked in the source (sofia_glue.c) and it says:

/* map sip responses to QSIG cause codes ala RFC4497 section 8.4.4 */ switch_call_cause_t sofia_glue_sip_cause_to_freeswitch(int status) { switch (status) { ...

...

case 480: return SWITCH_CAUSE_NO_USER_RESPONSE;

Which is code 18, it seems incorrect.. is it just me?

/Allan

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org