Hello Michael,

Ahh, so I was looking the wrong direction for the translation (qsig -> sip) 

Thanks for your help!

/Allan


On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4497#section-8.4.4

   480 Temporarily unavailable         18  No user responding


On Sep 1, 2016, at 5:03 PM, Allan Kristensen <ak@hejdu.dk> wrote:

Hello,

Why am I getting a (q850) NO_USER_RESPONSE (18) hangup cause from a SIP 480 Temp. unavail.

When the RFC 4497 says (pick one):

19 No answer from the user     480 Temporarily unavailable
20 Subscriber absent           480 Temporarily unavailable

I looked in the source (sofia_glue.c) and it says:

/* map sip responses to QSIG cause codes ala RFC4497 section 8.4.4 */
switch_call_cause_t sofia_glue_sip_cause_to_freeswitch(int status)
{
        switch (status) {
        ...
        ...
        case 480:
                return SWITCH_CAUSE_NO_USER_RESPONSE;

Which is code 18, it seems incorrect.. is it just me?

/Allan

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org