Yes, that's one of the reasons. Another point is that GPL v.3 is defined more clearly from legal perspective, at least from our legal adviser point of view. Diego Viola wrote:
Because they probably want a stronger copyleft license?
I prefer the GPL because of that reason.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Raffaele P. Guidi <raffaele.p.guidi@gmail.com <mailto:raffaele.p.guidi@gmail.com>> wrote:
uhm... nice! But why not MPL license (the same as freeswitch)?
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:06, paul.degt@gmail.com <mailto:paul.degt@gmail.com> <paul.degt@gmail.com <mailto:paul.degt@gmail.com>> wrote:
http://versafon.com/versafonweb/Software.jsp
Essentially it's a wrapper around inbound socket interface, not all events supported yet, and not all event parameters/variables. It's multi threaded and scaled well in testing. We offer commercial support and development for FreeSwitch as well.
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org