28 Jan
2008
28 Jan
'08
3:46 p.m.
On Jan 28, 2008, at 9:29 AM, Jonas Gauffin wrote:
Well. Isn't accept-blind-reg useless then?
Nope, People can register and bust nat and you can call them via their registration without having to setup authentication.
If auth-calls is false, then everyone can call, right? No need for accept-blind reg then If auth-calls is true, then accept-blind-reg doesnt work (as you said).
You're confusing authentication and registration. They provide different advantages.
I see accept-blind-reg true and auth-calls true as a way to force all users to register with FS. It's a bit better then having auth-calls set to false.
Or am I missing something?