Very well. Even at 30-40% CPU we'll have problem's scaling. Some more testing reveals that it's probably somewhere between 40-100% for 9 out of 10 of interps BUT interestingly enough the footprint in memory is quite low as compared to lumenvox, hovering around 3-5% mem usage compared to lumenvox's 25%-30% memory for a single interp. Ouch..! Some weird trade-off..? Memory for CPU usage. I hate those. Space/Time tradeoff crap. Brings back memories from comp lab... I'll toss some conditional additional cash at him if he can optimize this further. ;) Fred On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
It wasn't doing this till he did some fixes for the confidence score. I know when I was working on and testing while we were writing mod_pocketsphinx it sure didn't jump like that.. 30-40% tops with a few spikes to 100%. I personally tossed some money at him for the confidence score stuff which is the root of the evilness 100% cpu I suspect because it didn't do that before those last few changes went in.
/b
On Jul 14, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Frederick Jabre wrote:
What kind of hardware you running it on? This has been going to 100% CPU almost every time it does an interp for me. Tested on my P4 box and my AMD 4200+ Dual both with 1GB ram. Both with the same awful results. This can't be right given this thing was designed to run on an ARM processor.
I emailed Dave about it as well. Perhaps we need to incent him more ;)
Fred
Brian West sip:brian@freeswitch.org <sip%3Abrian@freeswitch.org>
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org