What are you trying to achieve with this setup? Centralized nat handling or something else? My thought was that RTPproxy/mediaproxy has to be externally controlled by own protocol to maintain rtp sessions, how do you plan to do that? 2013/5/23 adahary <adahary@gmail.com>
I would like to integrate FS with RTPproxy like openSips and kamailio are well integrated with it. FS should handle the SIP signaling and the RTPproxy should relay the RTP stream from A to B: A.sip <=> FS <=> B.sip FS = PASS-THRU A.rtp <=> RTPproxy <=> B.rtp.
I understand that FS should ask the RTPproxy to allocate UDP ports for both endpoint and then pass-thru-bridge them to cummunicate directly through the RTPproxy.
What I cannot yet figure out is how replace both A and B ip/port sets in SDP with the RTPproxy ip/port-udp. I'v read about switch_r_sdp (Leg.A) and switch_m_sdp (Leg.B !?) but couldn't figure it out.
how should I use switch_r_sdp (or/and switch_m_sdp) in my dialplan when when A calls B? Tried the following with no help. <action application="set"> </action> <action application="set"> </action>
Any tip/help/advise will be appriciated.
Regards
Assaf
-- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/FreeSwitch-Proxy-RTPProxy-Medi... Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Best regards, Dmitry Sytchev, IT Engineer