On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Jon Bruel <jbr@consiglia.dk> wrote:
I have made some load test, where an Asterisk server was controlled to make a high number of calls to a FreeSWITCH, which was registered on Asterisk. Each had its own server. The calls made to the FreeSWITCH were answered and echoed. The CPU load on the FreeSWITCH server approached 100 % at around 100 calls. Similar test with an Asterisk server would show 2-3 times less CPU load. Looping back to the Asterisk, thus avoiding a possible CPU-loading application (echo), did not show a significantly different result.
The test has been done on a CentOS 4 and a FC8 with similar result.
Any hints about how to increase the capacity to the level of several times the level of Asterisk – as reported by others? Are we possibly dealing with some hardware issues related to the NIC and its drivers. /Jon
yes, we need more information to be able to help you which protocol? SIP, I presume, then paste your profiles and also the dialplan you are using you can pastebin it all configs proc/cpuinfo proc/interrupts free ip addr dmesg freeswitch start up log freeswitch debug log for a SINGLE call etc, etc -- wasim h. baig | principal consultant | convergence pk | +92 300 8508070 | as you scope creep, so shall we reap ...