This would be a pretty cool feature and I know that OpenSIPS guys have discussed such a feature with FreeSWITCH dev. This would be a great addition for load balancing. Adding OpenSIPS user mailing list. Regards, Ali Pey On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Karsten Horsmann <khorsmann@gmail.com>wrote:
Hello List,
i read too the nice http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Enterprise_deploymentEnterprise Deployment Setups. Personaly i run FS 1.2.x as Session Border Controller where sip clients could register and internal (3rd party) IVRs could reachs the clients.
I plan to use DNS SRV on the to scale up the FS Servers and have fault talerance.
For that i have to diffrent uplinks that i could use for the DNS SRV Records and AFAIK i could use track-calls=true in sofia profiles to track the right incoming/outgoing profile.
The only thing i missed is that my 3rd party IVRs used FS as outbound proxy and therefore only one IP is spezified on the internal network.
With an virtual IP on the FS side i could solve that but then the FS servers is IMHO limited to be a active/passiv duo.
Any ideas how to handle that?
2014-02-17 2:45 GMT+01:00 jay binks <jaybinks@gmail.com>:
So I want to bash out a feature I was thinking of, please can anyone chime in some ideas on this.
So its easy to have OpenSIP / Kamailio ( dispatcher ) send SIP Options to FS to see if its responding .. this is great ...
My request would be to have some kind of control over the response FS Sends back. What I would love is to respond with idle CPU , current SPS / Max SPS or channels / Max Channels.
This is only a high level "this would be nice" , so I havnt totally thought this through but... we would have to provide an ACL for who to provide this back to, coz I wouldnt really want any old guy on the internet sending me options and me respond going ... oh yea bro, Im at 90% ... dont have to try hard to DDOS Me.. :)
but yea... if we could give this back to the load balancers, then we could easily instruct them to back traffic off to this gateway.
the next part is , how do you back off the traffic. one option is to have FS respond differently if any of these are close to thresholds. or to provide these values in custom headers, but that would require changes in dispatcher ( which is ok I Guess )
anyways... I wanted some input on peoples thoughts here.. let me know what you think.
Jay
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen *Karsten Horsmann*
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org