19 Apr
2011
19 Apr
'11
10:03 p.m.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Stephen Wilde <wstephen80@gmail.com> wrote:
Ok, thank you Rupa. My doubt was: why FS try to add a nat port mapping when there is no nat? But if this is only a log problem, then ok, I'll do a git pull. Stephen
The log is informational. I guess you could call it an impedance mismatch between the caller and the callee. The function that calls the mapping function doesn't know or care if nat is setup. The called mapping function logs a warning (now info) saying "hey dummy, nat isn't setup so I'm not going to do a nat map". So lowering to info is the easiest, maybe even debug is more appropriate. I can be easily convinced of that. -- -Rupa