Hi, I'm on this commit : arif@khost:~/src/freeswitch$ git show HEAD commit f8122e39c51240b99bf07a767afe2f8a698f1486 Now its segfaulting on startup.
From generated core :
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00007f245cc28df1 in su_casematch (s1=0x7f245cc7fc57 "", s2=0x3000000030 <Address 0x3000000030 out of bounds>) at su_string.c:224 224 unsigned char a = *s1++, b = *s2++; Clearly s2 is wrongly initialized. The backtrace : (gdb) bt #0 0x00007f245cc28df1 in su_casematch (s1=0x7f245cc7fc57 "", s2=0x3000000030 <Address 0x3000000030 out of bounds>) at su_string.c:224 #1 0x00007f245cc377ff in tport_server_addrinfo (mr=0x7f243c003c30, canon=0x7f243c003bfe "[::1]", family=0, host=0x7f245c958670 "::1", service=0x7f243c003c04 "5060", protocol=0x7f245cc7fc56 "*", transports=0x7f245c9589c0, return_addrinfo=0x7f245c958608) at tport.c:1814 #2 0x00007f245cc370a1 in tport_bind_server (mr=0x7f243c003c30, tpn=0x7f245c958770, transports=0x7f245c9589c0, public=tport_type_local, tags=0x7f245c958730) at tport.c:1652 #3 0x00007f245cc36762 in tport_tbind (self=0x7f243c003c30, tpn=0x7f245c958a50, transports=0x7f245c9589c0, tag=0x7f245cecae20 <tptag_ident>, value=139794152182707) at tport.c:1524 #4 0x00007f245cb8882d in nta_agent_add_tport (self=0x7f243c001e40, uri=0x7f24400099c0, tag=0x7f245cecae20 <tptag_ident>, value=139794152182707) at nta.c:2237 #5 0x00007f245cbc4e71 in nua_stack_init_transport (nua=0x7f2440007970, tags=0x7f24400098f0) at nua_register.c:1216 #6 0x00007f245cbd6b6b in nua_stack_init (root=0x7f243c001130, nua=0x7f2440007970) at nua_stack.c:194 #7 0x00007f245cc24441 in su_pthread_port_clone_main (varg=0x7f245c9d03d0) at su_pthread_port.c:340 #8 0x00007f2460ffae9a in start_thread () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit--- #9 0x00007f2460d27ccd in clone () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #10 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () In tport_server_addrinfo() : (gdb) list tport_server_addrinfo ... 1800 char const * const transports[], ... ... 1811 for (i = 0, N = 0; transports[i] && N < TPORT_N; i++) { 1812 su_addrinfo_t *ai = &hints[N]; 1813 1814 if (!su_casematch(protocol, transports[i]) && !su_strmatch(protocol, "*")) So char const * const transports[] is not correctly initialized before using its values in the for loop. (gdb) p transports[0] $3 = 0x3000000030 <Address 0x3000000030 out of bounds> (gdb) p transports[1] $4 = 0x7f245c958d00 "`\215\225\\$\177" So transports[0] is the problematic initialization here. Going back further, in libs/sofia-sip/libsofia-sip-ua/nta/nta.c: 2150 char const * const * tports = tports_sip; And here (gdb) ptype tports_sip type = const char * const[5] (gdb) p tports_sip[0] $6 = 0x7f245cc7fc38 "udp" (gdb) p tports[0] $7 = 0x3000000030 <Address 0x3000000030 out of bounds> (gdb) ptype tports_sip type = const char * const[5] (gdb) p tports $11 = (const char * const *) 0x7f245c9589c0 (gdb) p &tports_sip $12 = (const char * const(*)[5]) 0x7f245cebf660 <tports_sip> As it can be seen, tports diverged from initial tports_sip. It has been done in following snippet : 2197 if (strchr(tp, ',')) { 2198 int i; char *t, *tps[9] = {0}; 2199 2200 /* Split tp into transports */ 2201 for (i = 0, t = tp; t && i < 8; i++) { 2202 tps[i] = t; 2203 if ((t = strchr(t, ','))) 2204 *t++ = '\0'; 2205 } 2206 2207 tps[i] = NULL; 2208 tports = (char const * const *)tps; Now : (gdb) p tp $20 = "udp\000tcp\000H\215\225\\$\177\000\000\240\252\354\\".. So above code should parse "udp" in tports[0]. Which is not the case here. I'm assuming this bug has to generated from a more higher level, rather than happened in a file which has not been touched since 2006( I git blamed it). But bt does not have any calls to "non-sofia" stuff. This su_casematch() was called from two threads, 4 Thread 0x7f245eccb700 (LWP 7622) 0x00007f245cc28df1 in su_casematch ( s1=0x7f245cc7fc57 "", s2=0x3000000030 <Address 0x3000000030 out of bounds>) at su_string.c:224 * 1 Thread 0x7f245c959700 (LWP 7623) 0x00007f245cc28df1 in su_casematch ( s1=0x7f245cc7fc57 "", s2=0x3000000030 <Address 0x3000000030 out of bounds>) at su_string.c:224 Both calls to su_casematch seems problematic. Sorry for a long BUGREPORT. Actually i thought i should post my investigation if it helps the devs(After git blaming, i highly suspect that my investigation unearthed nothing , problem generated from elsewhere, which i could not find). I've not started git bisecting. If it helps, i will be happy to do that. -- Cheers arif