thanks Mathieu. I setup an IRC account to give it a try. Comme ça je pourrais t'embeter avec mes "pbms" :p rod Mathieu Rene wrote:
limit_hash uses a faster data structure then limit but works the same way for tne end-user.
viens sur IRC si t'as des questions en francais =)
Math
On 17-Mar-09, at 3:06 AM, rod wrote:
Hi,
not too hard :p but it's just a bad habit when I write in my native language (french). I guess that this spelling is not too common for english speaker.
I'll do my best next time to write it correctly.
@tamas you are right, we could use limit_hash the same way as limit when not specifying the /rate
@Mathieu did you suggest limit_hash is more scalable than limit? But I don't understand why limit_hash is not suitable for data replication (DB lookup for limit and memory for limit_hash??), even if I don't know how to do it with limit.
regards.
Raymond Chandler wrote:
Tamas wrote:
My guess is: pbm = problem :)
sure, but is it really that hard to spell all the way out?
-Ray
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org