2010/7/15 broken dash <brokendash@gmail.com>
are you doing any nat into the other subnets? virtual machines make things much more confusing... :-) do you mind busting out some ascii network diagramming action?
vmachine has two interface: vitual venet0 and "real" eth2 (via netdev_add) from machine. In machine interface eth2 completely dissapear and in vmachine it arises like it was a real one.
Network diagram eth0 eth1 eth2 192.168.1.0/128 x.x.x.x/29 172.20.252.6/30 | | | --------------------------------------------------------- | | machine | | --------------------------------------------------------- | | | venet0 | 192.168.1.128/32 | x.x.x.y/32 | | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | vmachine | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- default via x.x.x.z 192.168.1.0 directly via eth0 172.20.252.0/24 via 172.20.252.5 Hope this is much or less clear. The reason i use vm for the moment is because of i don't install X on machine (i'm using mod_skypopen). Unfortunatelly i cannot test freeswitch outside of vmachine for the same reason + over 172.20.252.2 it comes a lot of calls to Asterisk (installed on machine) for the moment and i can't do a lot of test in a daytime by bypassing interface to vmachine and playing around.