Actually its crazy rediculous... Companies like Sangoma cant even license it. That requirement for integrators isnt sangoma's, its VoiceAge's requirement On 1/14/13 2:57 PM, "Kristian Kielhofner" <kris@kriskinc.com> wrote:
My understanding is that AMR licensing is even more ridiculous than G729.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
Ah, damn you're right Kristian!
The data sheet http://sangoma.com/assets/docs/datasheets/en/d100.pdf contains this footnode that is omitted from the web page:
"Except for AMR and AMR-WB. Integrators must clear patent license with VoiceAge Corp."
:(
In which case anyone obtaining licenses from VoiceAge Corp should be free to use them with any implementation...
I guess this is due to the same patent pool mess Mike mentioned?
-Steve
On 14 January 2013 20:34, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
"All codecs are fully indemnified; no additional licensing is required for their use." Source: http://sangoma.com/products/media_processing/voice_transcoding_boards/d150.h tml
On 14 January 2013 19:58, Kristian Kielhofner <kris@kriskinc.com> wrote:
IIRC Sangoma doesn't provide licensing for AMR and AMR-WB (just the implementation).
AFAIK mod_sangoma_codec is no more legal than libamr.
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Ken http://www.FreeSWITCH.org http://www.ClueCon.com http://www.OSTAG.org irc.freenode.net #freeswitch