The point of Multi-tenant is you should not need to do that, waste valuable resources using multiple VM's, mange many configs (1 for each vm) vs 1 config for all tenants. With a system that does not support multi-tenant/domain/context, you are forced to do just that, this is one of the many reasons people looking for true multi-tenancy choose Freeswitch over the other options. Thanks, Moishe Grunstein Tornado Computer Systems, Inc. 212.400.7650 888.IPPBX.US Service Request Email: support@nysolutions.com Polycom Certified VAR Microsoft Small Business Specialist, Cisco SMB Select Certified Computer Networking * Managed Services * IP Video Surveillance * Network Assessments * Web Solutions * Voice over IP * Disaster Recovery * Network Security * Site Surveys * CMS -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Richards Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 5:37 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Multi-Tenant Versus Multiple FS Instances Has anyone considered the Multi-tenant implementation (as described in the FS Wiki) versus having multiple Freeswitch instances running on the same machine (i.e. one instance for each company)? I am wondering if there is a trade-off between these two approaches? Regards, Jerry _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org