You really never should be messing with the sdp because you can cause a violation in the SOA policy. The negotiation is between the 2 endpoints so if you modify A's sdp it could confuse it when you reply back with B's sdp which was created under false pretenses. On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Kristian Kielhofner <kris@kriskinc.com>wrote:
I understand why this limitation is in place but I've always wondered if it's a /hard/ limitation that has to be there...
What about a channel var/sofia param for bypass_media/proxy_media that would allow codec_string, ep_codec_string, absolute_codec_string and friends to work?
Is this worthy of a bounty? I think it would be much nicer than resorting to direct SDP manipulation. For those of us using FreeSWITCH as a signaling only SBC, a VERY nice thing to have!
Let me know.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale@gmail.com> wrote:
ya
-- Kristian Kielhofner http://www.astlinux.org http://blog.krisk.org http://www.star2star.com http://www.submityoursip.com http://www.voalte.com
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com <MSN%3Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com<PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org <sip%3A888@conference.freeswitch.org> googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org<googletalk%3Aconf%2B888@conference.freeswitch.org> pstn:+19193869900