There are a number of issues you can be running into... It really depends on how your app works, what your actual configuration of freeswitch is, disk IO subsystem, ulimits, etc etc....
From: Dennis <odermann@googlemail.com> Reply-To: <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:31:00 +0100 To: <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Performance testing: FS and own App?
if i do the same test with the 9998, it does not to seem much better:
20.0(4000 ms)/1.000s 5061 68.25 s 1174 xx.xx.xx.xx:5060(UDP)
0 new calls during 1.008 s period 9 ms scheduler resolution 710 calls (limit 1000) Peak was 782 calls, after 58 s 0 Running, 710 Paused, 0 Woken up 0 out-of-call msg (discarded) 1 open sockets 595580 Total echo RTP pckts 1st stream 2809.336 last period RTP rate (kB/s) 0 Total echo RTP pckts 2nd stream 0.000 last period RTP rate (kB/s)
Messages Retrans Timeout Unexpected-Msg INVITE ----------> 1174 0 0 100 <---------- 1174 0 0 180 <---------- 0 0 0 183 <---------- 0 0 0 200 <---------- E-RTD1 480 0 0 ACK ----------> 480 0 Pause [ 0ms] 480 0 BYE ----------> 464 0 0 200 <---------- 464 0 0
what settings could i review to get more out of the server?
our setup is a new xeon quad core, 4 gb ram and ubuntu 64-bit. we also entered the ulimit lines and set "manage-presence" to false.
thanks dennis
2008/12/23 Ken Rice <krice@suspicious.org>:
Freeswitch can handle a large volume of call... I suggest you review your configs to make sure you don't have any of the default or arbitrary other limits in there... We routinely run > 1500 concurrent calls on dual quad core hardware at call rates far above what you tested at
Ken
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org