It's not paranoid, it's a logic and normal question. For me, but as to be confirmed by freeswitch dev and c expert, FS compile with linked library by default. And doing : $ ldd <path_to_fs>/bin/freeswitch show you the linked librairy with your binary on your system. If someone else can confirm my post too, I'm not 100% sure. Thanks 2015-01-30 21:01 GMT+01:00 Oleg Stolyar <olegstolyar@gmail.com>:
Yep, just being paranoid and want to absolutely confirm that the standard FreeSWITCH build links libraries (including glibc) dynamically.
On Jan 30, 2015 11:39 AM, "Sergey Okhapkin" <sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org> wrote:
There is no need to rebuild an application linked against a dynamic library.
On Friday 30 January 2015 11:30:28 Oleg Stolyar wrote:
Sorry if the question is naive - trying to be paranoid here.
On my CentOS machines I updated my glibc version to one that fixed the GHOST vulnerability.
Do I need to rebuild FS or is the library linked dynamically, so there is no need to rebuild?
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org