Stephen, I presume you have an XML dialplan for basic call routing? Brett's question seemed to encompass ALL configuration, not just viewing live events. -Avi On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Stephen Dame <sdame@207me.com> wrote:
Brett,****
** **
For simple stuff that doesn’t need to scale, I use a 5th approach, I just use bash scripts, php, and a few ajax calls that just call fs_cli –X. to do 100% of functionality. built a simple switchboard that shows live events, plays sound cues, transfers calls into conferences etc. ajax is getting events every second to update UI.****
** **
Not pretty, but just took a few days to code and get into production.****
** **
Regards,****
Stephen****
*From:* freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Ben Langfeld *Sent:* Friday, September 07, 2012 10:01 AM *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] best FS interface for development****
** **
The Adhearsion framework firmly takes the 3PCC approach via inbound event socket, and does a similar thing on Asterisk. We believe that to be the best way to isolate business logic from the switch.****
Regards, Ben Langfeld
****
On 7 September 2012 15:43, Brett Clark - Grasshopper < bclark@grasshopper.com> wrote:****
There seems to be at least 4 general ways for customizing FS:****
- Use the event socket and build an app to interface with it****
- Use mod lua, or similar, to develop in a particular language****
- Develop your own ‘module’ to interface directly with the core****
- Use the XML interface to implement IVR, PBX, and voicemail type functionality and all the rest.****
****
How prevalent is each approach in the community? It seems like everyone is doing a little of both, but maybe someone has a better handle of what the actual ratios are? ****
****
Which is best suited for an arbitrarily large and complex application? I realize this isn’t a simple question—what I want is to understand the most evolved and featureful way to interface with FS? I don’t want to adopt an approach which isn’t being actively maintained or is missing features. As new stuff is added to FS, which approach will allow me to adopt those new features most easily?****
****
Thanks! Brett****
****
****
****
****
****
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org****
** **
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org