Stress test results are only useful to make the headlines or for PhD students, those tests should only be made by experts (unbiased if possible) that and results should be shown in a special "cool-pure-raw performance testing" page. For the rest of us, real life scenarios with a small description of the modules involved would be useful to help with server dimensioning. If people contribute, with enough data it could give a pretty nice idea of what to expect. Of course those results can vary a lot so a huge disclaimer must be there to avoid having special people (mainly US citizens) suing the wiki owner. ;-) François. On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 11:01 -0500, Anthony Minessale wrote:
Its an ok thing as long as it comes with a disclaimer that "results may vary" and "you have to know what you are doing" And those who work on it need to volunteer to help with the emails it may generate asking why they can't match the results =D
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Jean-Yves F. Barbier <12ukwn@gmail.com> wrote:
Le Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:10:32 -0500, Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale@gmail.com> a écrit :
The problem is that performance testing is very fluid and relevant to each machine and OS and test performed and you can't get concrete expectations without some advanced skills in deploying FS.
Well, it could have a real interest by adding the tweaked parameters, may be there are some, yet unexplored, that would raise the response.
-- Why don't elephants eat penguins ? Because they can't get the wrappers off ...
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org