Why is that? - a lot of web pages I have read claim that IAX is more secure and efficient. I have no problem with using SIP whatsoever and it certainly appears to be ubiquitous. I am a complete newcomer to VoIP and I am trying to do this as securely as possible since I want to run freeswitch on a Xen VPS which will be visible on the internet. Anyway, since my first question, I have worked my way through the wiki, read a lot of example configs and made some sense of the docs. I now have a very basic config working (with SIP) on a local vmware image using the 'quick and dirty' Makefile method. I removed all of the example configs from the xml files (those default extensions and passwords scared me) and added just one for extension 1000, plus my dialplan and inbound/outbound settings. One question: is there any reason not to use a smaller extension number range, like 200-210, for example? Now to figure out how to get time based roaming working... Thanks, Matt. On Fri, February 5, 2010 6:43 am, Michael Jerris wrote:
iax2 support has been removed from FreeSWITCH in current trunk and will not be in the 1.0.5 release.
Mike