Dave, when you say, "...If you're going to use IPv6, set up the infrastructure FIRST," we both agree 100%. You appear to have a well ordered DNS infrastructure and an admin discipline and overarch to effect it, where the scope of the tool covers off your operations and problem set. :-) The mental gymnastics -- and the cacoffiny -- will rise over what "infrastructure" components work good/better/best for each admin once the carriers/providers, data centers, hosting providers, wireless, "guestnet" providers -- starbucks, hotels, corporate visitors nets, etc. -- all start trying it their way. And all i'm saying is that 1:1 NAT (not PAT) can (and will) play a viable role in competent/robust IPv6 infrastructures; and, therefore, IMO, NAT isn't going away through IPv6 pass 1, 2, or 3. Bet 'ya a dollar and see you in five-seven years at Cluecon. ;-) Cheers, ————— iThing: Big thumbs & little keys. Please excuse typo, spelling and grammar errors • Last night I played a blank CD at full blast. The Mime next door went nuts. On 2012-12-24, at 21:10, "Dave R. Kompel" <drk@drkngs.net> wrote:
If you're going to use IPv6, set up the infrastructure FIRST,