Using it you still have one point of failure - only one router and it's on one internet line... What if one of these things goes down for a period? :-) I would prefer to have 2 separate servers on 2 different internet lines (better different providers even). Thanks, vIT 2010/3/16 Tihomir Culjaga <tculjaga@gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Vitalii Colosov <vetali100@gmail.com>wrote:
Tihomir, Could you please add more details to the following?
"So, i'd suggest to bring up a LAN_HA and have a floating address between your routing servers.... of course the you should be using ODBC in the core to have registrations on both servers."
Do you have any links that describe how to implement this kind of fail over?
This is the topic for you: http://www.ultramonkey.org/3/topologies/ and this is what i already have implemented: http://www.ultramonkey.org/3/topologies/ha-eg.html
I thought about configuring 2 DNS servers on 2 Routing servers, so if one will go down, traffic will be addressed to another, but at the moment I don't have enough knowledge how to implement this.
don't like the idea as you are introducing one more point of failure :)
Thanks, vIT
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org