Most likely these are going to be basically the same. The difference would be if the far end performs an auth challenge. With the gateway you are prepared to respond to the challenge w/ proper SIP creds. -MC On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Colin Mason <cmason@frontiernetworks.ca>wrote:
Hello,****
** **
I am using FreeSWITCH as a SIP router to route calls through a few different private networks without answering the call. It gets answered downstream from my servers. I was wondering if there was a functionality difference between:****
** **
<action application="bridge" data="sofia/gateway/opensips_toronto/$1"/>*** *
** **
And****
** **
<action application="bridge" data="sofia/mpls/$1@10.10.10.10:5060"/>****
** **
** **
** **
My gateway is defined as follows****
** **
<include>****
<gateway name="opensips_toronto">****
<param name="proxy" value="10.10.10.10:5060"/>****
<param name="register" value="false"/>****
</gateway>****
</include>****
** **
** **
Thanks,****
** **
Colin****
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Michael S Collins Twitter: @mercutioviz http://www.FreeSWITCH.org http://www.ClueCon.com http://www.OSTAG.org