Before trying anything else, use real hardware instead of virtual. A virtual server with this kind of load will only cause you trouble. Actually - most virtual solutions will cause you problems :) Also, performance with average call duration of 4s is not really anything that would happen in real life. But first of all - get real hardware. /Peter ________________________________ Från: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] för Hanie Maghsoudy [h.maghsoudy@gmail.com] Skickat: den 7 juli 2012 09:46 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help Ämne: [Freeswitch-users] Performance Testing Hi all, I searched for FreeSwitch call capacity, but most of the results wasn't new. So, I wanna ask if anybody has either tested FreeSwitch's performance recently, or got a dramatic result in real environment? I tested call quality on this machine: Virtual FreeSwitch server OS: CentOS release 6.2 - x86_64 CPU: 8 processor - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5670 @ 2.93GHz Memory: 8 G After receiving incoming calls, FreeSwitch routed them to another sip server, without transcoding. The other server transmitted calls by playing an audio file. Meanwhile, I called an extension in FreeSwitch to test the call quality. The result was like this: 1000 Concurrent calls Call duration: 160s Call rate: 6 cps (just creating channels) Max used Memory: 1416M Max CPU load: 0.24 Max Network throughput (recv/send): 6711k/80k Quality: Good This test was taken before tearing down the channels. Then, I took another test to estimate calls per second, and it wasn't what I was expected! 150 Concurrent calls Call duration: 4s Call rate: 30 cps (creating and tearing down) Max used Memory: 1293M Max CPU load: 4.50 Max Network throughput (recv/send): 828k/60k Quality: Average And when I increase call rate to 50 cps: 1000 Concurrent calls Call duration: 4s Call rate: 50 cps (creating and tearing down) Max used Memory: 1730M Max CPU load: 29.9 Max Network throughput (recv/send): 1367k/202k Quality: Bad Why call per second is such a big problem? Did anyone get a better result on this? Thanks, Hanie !DSPAM:4ff7e86232761844718139!