So *relying* on a 100 Trying is dangerous, but keeping an eye out for it is okay. To the OP (Neil) I'd ask: what is the failure condition when a 100 Trying does not come back? Is that a form of "gateway down"? Is it possibly to use SIP OPTIONS to test this instead of relying upon a 100? -MC On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, but it can be skipped - for instance if you're autoanswering you could skip the 100 and jump straight to the 200. Or similarly if you're generating ringback jump straight to the 183. There's no reason that 100 is needed first.
-Steve
On 21 April 2011 15:31, Kristian Kielhofner <kris@kriskinc.com> wrote:
When using UDP it's typically a good idea to fire some kind of provisional response ASAP to prevent the SIP retransmission timers from freaking out and repeatedly resending the initial INVITE. That's where 100 Trying comes in.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
That seems like rather weird request since the 100 trying isn't required.
/b
-- Kristian Kielhofner
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org