FreeSWITCH relies heavily on timers, so every media playback or conference will be (probably severely) distracted if your kernel ticks are not frequent enough. In regards to virtualization, the virtualization itself is not too bad, but the problem is, that with most of hosting offers you get a best-effort service, sharing the CPU power with other unknown parties. So, you can't really say how many simultaneous calls your host can handle. By the way, scaleway.com has just published a new offering for physical hosting. On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:55 PM, François <fdelawarde@wirelessmundi.com> wrote:
Is it still recommended to use custom 1000HZ kernels for FS servers or can we go tickless now?
Any difference if FS is installed in baremetal vs virtualized?
Thanks, François.
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org