Hi All, I've been doing some testing against FreeSwitch 1.2.0 and noticed what looks like a bug. root@Freeswitch> version FreeSWITCH Version 1.2.0-rc2+git~20120616T193227Z~068586f28f+unclean~20120618T093505Z 192.168.8.238 = Freeswitch 192.168.8.168 = proxyhost.test.net A Client sends the following SUBSCRIBE to freeswitch SUBSCRIBE sip:2001@proxyhost.test.net SIP/2.0 Call-ID: 2039516157894306129@192.168.8.168 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.8.168:5070;branch=z9hG4bKC0A808A82E8652DB03 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.8.168:5070;branch=z9hG4bKC0A808A82E8652DB11 To: sip:2001@proxyhost.test.net CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE Contact: <sip:proxyhost.test.net:5060> From: sip:2001@proxyhost.test.net ;tag=1297284766*476741369860*990463165~476741369860~fmc.sar~ Content-Length: 0 Expires: 3600 Event: message-summary Accept: application/simple-message-summary Route: <sip:192.168.8.238;lr> Max-Forwards: 69 FreeSwitch responds with: SIP/2.0 202 Accepted Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.8.168:5070;branch=z9hG4bKC0A808A82E8652DB03 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.8.168:5070;branch=z9hG4bKC0A808A82E8652DB11 From: <sip:2001@proxyhost.test.net
;tag=1297284766*476741369860*990463165~476741369860~fmc.sar~ To: <sip:2001@proxyhost.test.net>;tag=9t8fu6DedmnQ Call-ID: 2039516157894306129@192.168.8.168 CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE Contact: <sip:2001@192.168.8.238:5060> Expires: 3600 User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.2.0-rc2+git~20120616T193227Z~068586f28f+unclean~20120618T093505Z Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer Subscription-State: active;expires=3600 Content-Length: 0
So I would expect subsequent NOTIFY messages to be send to the address & port in the contact: sip: proxyhost.test.net:5060 (contact header from SUBSCRIBE) However I do not see the NOTIFY requests arrive at sip:proxyhost.test.net on port 5060, a wireshark trace on FreeSwitch says is sending them to a different port, port 33406 which is the port Freeswitch received the request on. This is how the packet looks in WireShark: Ethernet II, Src: 42:61:a8:ef:c3:de (42:61:a8:ef:c3:de), Dst: 96:cd:bb:a4:a4:2e (96:cd:bb:a4:a4:2e) Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 192.168.8.238 (192.168.8.238), Dst: 192.168.8.168 (192.168.8.168) User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: sip (5060), Dst Port: 34406 (34406) **Would expect this to be 5060** Request-Line: NOTIFY sip:proxyhost.test.net:5060 SIP/2.0 I thought this defect might be in the ball park: http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-4014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... Anyone seen this? To resolve I used TCP instead of UDP but wanted to flag it up to see if anyone else had seen it Regards Steve P -------------------- Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Thrupoint, Inc.