was FS 3277: http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3277 actually committed? If not, why? Seems like a good addition. On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:24 AM, <B.Tietz@pinguin.ag> wrote:
Hi,
That is the reason. I think FS is able to act as a cluster. So many machines act as one and should have the same name... Just an idea.
greets.
Can I ask when exactly the "switchname" should be used then?
FS 3277: http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3277
Suggests it was implemented for the exact reason of keeping the names of two switches in an HA configuration identical, but it seems they are best >left separate.
I don't mind cleaning up some of the detail in the HA Wiki but would just like to know when the names should be the same and when they should be >different i.e. shoudl the names be the same for kind kind of active / active setup?
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org