28 Feb
2010
28 Feb
'10
12:45 a.m.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Maciej Bylica <mbsip@gazeta.pl> wrote:
Thx Michael for Your prompt answer. I did exactly what you had said -- in addition there was a need to use <match>, but result is possitive.
You are quite correct - I left out the <match> and optional <nomatch> nodes. -MC