Yeah clear as! : ) I will have a go at setting up my own STUN server, although there doesn't seem to be many options out there! Do you have any suggestions for possible STUN servers to use? Kind regards Ben -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Kristian Kielhofner Sent: 13 October 2011 17:04 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] TLS problems Ben, If your endpoints support STUN and everything works correctly you won't need an RTP proxy or anything else (you're using near end NAT traversal). If you absolutely cannot disable bypass_media mode an RTP proxy is out of the question. However - there is a mode of TURN/ICE that effectively is an RTP proxy... Clear as mud, right? On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Ben Naylor <bnaylor@sirran.com> wrote:
Many thanks for the info Kristian, it has definetly been a bit of a nightmare understanding how it all works!
Bypass_media is unfortunately unavoidable, so it looks like it's going to be a STUN server. You mention SIP latching/RTP proxy, would this replace the need for a STUN server, or work alongside it?
The benefit of a STUN server is that it supports TLS, which is an absolute requirement in our case.
Thanks again for your help.
Ben.
-- Kristian Kielhofner FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org