It would be unique you are right but I am not sure I can get its value if A puts the call on hold, calls C and wants to add it to the conference whose name dependent of the uuid of another session. I think if I use ${uuid} to add C I will have the uuid of the session between A and C and not A and B no? And I really have to configure this from the dialplan so statically. Am I wrong somewhere?? Carole Rupa Schomaker (lists)-2 wrote:
On 12/17/2008 7:34 AM, Carole O. wrote:
My main problem is the name of the conference. Since everybody should be able to convert a simple call into a conference, the conference's name has to be unique each time. I have chosen to make it dependent on the caller number which is not perfect because then he is the only one which can bridge the call and add member. However, I do not have any other idea, maybe I have missed another possibility.
If the conf name has to be unique, why not ensure that by making the conference name based on the uuid of the a-leg?
Thanks, Carole
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/dynamic-conference-tp21053181p21054080.html Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.