I've submitted a patch for that :P On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Bzzz <lazyvirus@gmx.com> wrote:
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:41:32 -0700 curriegrad2004 <curriegrad2004@gmail.com> wrote:
There aren't any implications. The -nonat switch just simply tells FreeSWITCH to discover for an UPnP enabled NAT gateway so it can forward ports dynamically via that API. If you choose to open up ports the manual way then having that -nonat switch enabled doesn't make much of a difference.
My bad: too much time w/o touching FS (but very bad name too, noupnpnat would have been a lot more logical:(
JY -- <Strasph> If I die in 5 minutes, what do you wanna tell me ? <Decibel> "What's your root password?"
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org