The following section in RFC3551 states the same http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3551#section-4.5.4 The encodings of G.726 are here denoted as G726-40, G726-32, G726-24, and G726-16. Prior to 1990, G721 described the 32 kbit/s ADPCM encoding, and G723 described the 40, 32, and 16 kbit/s encodings. Thus, G726-32 designates the same algorithm as G721 in RFC 1890. ________________________________ From: Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Sent: Wed, January 6, 2010 9:50:46 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Codec Negotiation: Codec telephone-event:101:8000:20 They are in fact one in the same please see ITU. /b On Jan 5, 2010, at 11:40 PM, Mark Campbell-Smith wrote:
Thanks Brian and Anthony.
Brian: 2 = G723-32 Do you mean G721 instead of G723-32 ?
2010-01-05 18:57:56.845029 [DEBUG] sofia_glue.c:3306 Audio Codec Compare [G721:2:8000:20]/[G726-32:2:8000:20]
So the only codec they have offered is G723-32 (or G721), which FS only supports as a passthrough codec. Is that correct?
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org