Doesn't SILK scale down on bandwidth much lower than CELT can? -Michael -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Jason White Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 6:26 PM To: FreeSWITCH-users Subject: [Freeswitch-users] SILK speech codec, Celt, FreeSWITCH I just read a blog post about this. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vos-silk-00 My main questions about it would be 1. whether it will be licenced in such a way as to permit free software/open-source implementation in FreeSWITCH. I suppose this partly depends on IETF's patent policy. 2. How it compares with Celt, which doesn't give rise to any known patent issues and is available for FreeSWITCH today. for other FreeSWITCH users who wish to experiment with Celt and listen to high-quality wide-band calls, it should be noted that Celt is still under development and backward-incompatible changes have occurred in the past. Making sure that both endpoints are using the same version of Celt solves this, otherwise the audible results can be rather unpleasant. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org