Lets get a JIRA filed, outline the situation, desired behaviors and lets see if we can plan out how to address this. -- Brian West brian@freeswitch.org FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC PO BOX 2531 Brookfield, WI 53008-2531 Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest http://www.freeswitchbook.com http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com T: +1.918.420.9001 | F: +1.918.420.9002 | M: +1.918.424.WEST iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9001 ISN: 410*543 Skype:briankwest PGP Key: http://www.bkw.org/key.txt (AB93356707C76CED) On Feb 21, 2014, at 6:05 PM, Russell Treleaven <rtreleaven@bunnykick.ca> wrote:
After a brief discussion during the conference call early today William King urged me to send a message to the list about the profile parameter auth-all-packets.
I did some testing with auth-all-packets=true and the following methods are not challenged OPTIONS, SUBSCRIBE, INFO and MESSAGE. So auth-all-packets does not auth all packets. The documentation has been updated to reflect the current behaviour of auth-all-packets. I doubt there is much interest in having OPTIONS requests challenged but maybe SUBSCRIBE should be. A parameter auth-messages already exists and similar ones could be made for other methods.
What are your thoughts?
Sincerely,
Russell Treleaven
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org