On 24 February 2010 04:48, Robert Hadley <robert.hadley@teotech.com> wrote:
On the http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Openzap.conf_Examples wiki page, is there a typo in the wanpipe /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/openzap.conf example concerning specifying the fxo-channel vs. fxs-channel?
I agree. The first example looks correct to me; the 2nd example looks wrong. See the table I created to try and explain what term to use where: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/OpenZAP#FXO.2FFXS_Terminology In the examples you quoted, ports 1 and 2 are extension ports, so are FXS ports, but should be defined as FXO ports in openzap.conf. Ports 3 and 4 are telephone line ports, so are FXO ports, but should be defined as FXS ports in openzap.conf. I have only used zaptel myself, however I suspect the same applies to wanpipe. -- Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>