On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:47:42 +0100, Ognjen Seslija <oseslija@gmail.com> wrote:
If FreeSWITCH is configured in bypass-media mode, and the endpoint behing NAT cannot use any of the NAT avoiding techiques to send public IP in the SDP (STUN etc.) then you'll have issues.
In this scenario, Freeswitch and the SIP end-points are configured to handle NAT. I'm just curious to know what issues/drawbacks I should expect if I decide to lower the CPU/network load on the Freeswitch server if I decide to configure it in bypass-media mode. Are there features that aren't available when the two end-points speak RTP directly instead of having RTP packets go through Freeswitch?
You can do what do I do, which is to make different sofia profiles for NATed and non-NATED endpoints (FS has many server-side nat traversal mechanisms).
If you have time, I'm interested in knowing more about your setup.