Nothing. It's just hard to change the way people used to do things. I'd say if we can use existing FreePBX (version 2) to control underlying FreeSWITCH, then people will be jumping ship. But, that's just for IP PBX side of business. Wholesale or dialer application developer has been adopting the FreeSWITCH solution instead of Asterisk in general. Which side of critical mass are you referring to? (IP PBX or?) Henry On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Craig Smith <craigesmith@gmail.com> wrote:
Some recent frustrations with Asterisk have me looking at FreeSWITCH, but it’s lack? of adoption leaves me wondering.
Here are some questions I have as a long time Asterisk user, dCAP, and Astricon attendee.
Why hasn’t FreeSWITCH reached a critical mass?
Is the XML configuration that scary?
What does Asterisk have that FreeSWITCH doesn’t?
Does FreeSWITCH need better documentation and/or tutorials?
Is it git?
Would a FreeSWITCH certification help?
I want to help the FreeSWITCH project, but I’m not developer or philanthropist , what can I do?
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org