Well. Isn't accept-blind-reg useless then? If auth-calls is false, then everyone can call, right? No need for accept-blind reg then If auth-calls is true, then accept-blind-reg doesnt work (as you said). I see accept-blind-reg true and auth-calls true as a way to force all users to register with FS. It's a bit better then having auth-calls set to false. Or am I missing something? On Jan 28, 2008 4:17 PM, Brian West <brian.west@mac.com> wrote:
I don't think so. Blind reg defeats auth-calls because it accepts ANYTHING without a challenge. While auth-calls will challenge invites.
/b
On Jan 28, 2008, at 9:13 AM, Jonas Gauffin wrote:
Shouldn't it be possible to use auth-calls set to true in combination with accept-blind-reg set to true?
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org