Well, I am the guy who made the modification in the wiki. I use sangoma card and the openzap file is generated by the Setup script from sangoma driver. It seems that the terminology used by zaptel is not used in wanpipe configuration. I have an A400 card with an FXO module (providing ports 11 and 12) and an FXS module (providing ports 9 and 10) My openzap.conf is like this : [span wanpipe FXS] name => Analog phone 1 number => 9000 fxs-channel => 1:9 name => Analog phone 2 number => 9001 fxs-channel => 1:10 [span wanpipe FXO] name => POTS line 1 number => 1234567890 fxo-channel => 1:11 name => POTS line 2 number => 0987654321 fxo-channel => 1:12 About the name and number, this is what I get here by observation : If I make a call from channel 1:9 and the diaplan do not modify the CID variables, the called person see "Analog Phone 1" as CID name and 9000 as CID number. On the other hand, if I receive a call on channel 1:11, the "channel_name" variable raised in the diaplan would be openzap/2/1/1234567890 (I guess here that if number is not specified, I would get openzap/2/1). Moreover (still this is by observation) if the carrier does not send CID (to be precise, I mean no modulation is received) the CID name and number raised in diaplan on incoming calls are set to name and number from openzap.conf I hope this is clear enought François On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:24:31 +1100, Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au> wrote:
On 24 February 2010 04:48, Robert Hadley <robert.hadley@teotech.com> wrote:
On the http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Openzap.conf_Examples wiki page, is there a typo in the wanpipe /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/openzap.conf example concerning specifying the fxo-channel vs. fxs-channel?
I agree. The first example looks correct to me; the 2nd example looks wrong.
See the table I created to try and explain what term to use where:
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/OpenZAP#FXO.2FFXS_Terminology
In the examples you quoted, ports 1 and 2 are extension ports, so are FXS ports, but should be defined as FXO ports in openzap.conf.
Ports 3 and 4 are telephone line ports, so are FXO ports, but should be defined as FXS ports in openzap.conf.
I have only used zaptel myself, however I suspect the same applies to wanpipe.