imho this is quite a strange scheme. Why not to keep all registrations on Kamailio? Register should be used in front of users. 2014-10-20 14:43 GMT+06:00 Volkan Oransoy <voransoy@gmail.com>:
Hi all,
I have two FS boxes that share same database. These two boxes are behind two kamailio sip proxies. When a sip proxy receives a successful registration, it replicates the registration to one of FS boxes with a path variable. The FS box that receives registration writes this data to database. Everything goes well at this scenario. But when I check, registration numbers are inconsistent.
"sofia status profile internal reg" command shows all the records in the DB and matches at two FS boxes. But "show registrations" shows less than half of these records and numbbers are different at two FS boxes. I think that's why some users get UNALLOCATED_NUMBER error when they receive a call from opposite FS box.
Is there anything that I miss at this setup? Or what is the common setup for such a cluster?
/Volkan Oransoy
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Kamil Nigmatullin Tel: 77272323748 mob: 7 (707) 2517003 Skype: kamil.nigmatullin