Why are you using libpri with Sangoma boards? I am not that familiar with Sangoma boards myself, but looking at FreeTDM I would expect this to be the most optional path for Sangoma hardware? Jan -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Phone Sent: 9. juli 2010 15:46 To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Native stacks I am interested in this discussion of the PRI stack. We are currently using libpri with a Samgoma B601DE. Things are working fine, except for the fact that we are not receiving Caller_ID "Name" on incoming calls. In examining traces, it appears that the name comes along milliseconds later in a separate facility message, and FS is not picking this up? I am curious if others using libpri with FS and Sangoma are getting Caller-ID "Name" delivery. Not sure if we are not configured quite right, or if there is some other libpri issue with FS. Jan Berger wrote:
What E1/T1 hardware are you using?
Libpri is maintained by a larger group. They had started to get QSIG last time I checked - they also have basic SS7 for simple ISUP calls in libss7. The stack itself is a maintenance problem, but Digium has the strength to maintain it - and in the end that is all that matters unless you want to maintain things yourself.
Jan
-----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Helmut Kuper Sent: 9. juli 2010 14:37 To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Native stacks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
yes, Stefan Knoblich (stkn@freeswitch.org) is working or has worked on a new ISDN stack supporting timers for the call states.
I have and using a openzap Q931StateTE stack which is basing on his early work. A added and fixed some stuff on it, so that it works quite good for basic calls on a Avaya-PRI as well as on a EWSD-PRI.
The changes I did I have sent to Stefan, but got no new informations from him since a few months.
Maybe he is busy, maybe things are passed to Sangoma, maybe there is no big interest in a native stack, dunno...
At least I have a need for a reliable slim isdn stack supporting Q931 and if possible QSIG.
It looks that libpri is the better choice as a future safe stack. But I've never tested it with FS.
regards from sunny and hot germany
Helmut
On 09.07.2010 14:01, Jan Berger wrote:
Hi,
Creating a new thread.
If it is any interest for a native stack in FreeSWITCH we could address it later. It lacks the state-engine. Actually, last time I asked I was told someone in Germany was working on this?
But, as I looked at it recently I concluded that with Sangoma supporting their own boards, and Digium maintaining libpri for theirs - we basically have covered a majority of the E1/T1 boards that is used in here. Correct
me
if I am wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFMNxfk4tZeNddg3dwRAqMxAJ0Vh5NnUY3HBEexz7ps8zR3GfGa6ACfTdhk Z+nSJ/7WC12tJyG/F3UxIEY= =5nmh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org