Hi guys. I've just compiled the latest v1.2_stable branch and now i can see the following output after a status command in fs_cli: UP 0 years, 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes, 21 seconds, 678 milliseconds, 716 microseconds FreeSWITCH (Version 1.2.12 ) is ready 0 session(s) since startup 0 session(s) - peak 0, last 5min 0 0 session(s) per Sec out of max 30, peak 0, last 5min 0 1000 session(s) max min idle cpu 0.00/99.00 *Current Stack Size/Max 240K/8192K *It seems FS still sticks to the 240K stack size although it can now see the 8192K Max. Moreover that error msg about stack > 240 at startup has disappeared. Anymore interpretations on this? -- *Nuno Miguel Reis* | *Unified Communication** Systems* M. +351 913907481 | nreis@wavecom.pt WAVECOM-Soluções Rádio, S.A. Cacia Park | Rua do Progresso, Lote 15 3800-639 AVEIRO | Portugal T. +351 309 700 225 | F. +351 234 919 191 *GPS<http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msa=0&msid=202333747613191340808.0004b4b227a6144f0df88>| www.wavecom.pt** <http://www.wavecom.pt/>* [image: Description: Description: WavecomSignature]<http://www.wavecom.pt/pt/wavecom/premios.php> [image: Publicity] <http://www.wavecom.pt/pt/mail_eventos.php> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote:
240 or maybe 244 is right.. 8192 is not.. that being said.. it can cause issues on some newer linux, it will change that setting for everything, so you might need to do it in a bash script that starts freeswitch instead.
On Aug 12, 2013, at 10:53 PM, jay binks <jaybinks@gmail.com> wrote:
can we just get a concensus from the people who know ?? :)
Anthm, MikeJ, BWK ..
it sounds like ulimit -s 240 is the way to go, right ?
On 13 August 2013 12:28, Ken Rice <krice@freeswitch.org> wrote:
well if you look at the wiki history there seems to be a fight over what to set it to, i always set it to 240 cause it makes that error msg anout stack > 240 at startup go away
Ken Sent from my iPad
On Aug 12, 2013, at 21:13, jay binks <jaybinks@gmail.com> wrote:
So Ken,
we should change http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Performance_testing_and_configurations to be :
ulimit -s 240
Just want to be 100% sure before changing it .
Jay
On 13 August 2013 11:18, Ken Rice <krice@freeswitch.org> wrote:
yes this is normal, if fs can auto adjust it to 240 it will... you dont need > that for the thread stack anyway
Ken Sent from my iPad
On Aug 12, 2013, at 19:52, Nuno Reis <nreis@wavecom.pt> wrote:
Hi guys.
I'm currently using the recommended ulimit settings as defined here:
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Performance_testing_and_configurations
Although there's at least one parameter that doesn't seem to be right when i do a status at fs_cli:
UP 0 years, 0 days, 10 hours, 25 minutes, 14 seconds, 617 milliseconds, 626 microseconds FreeSWITCH is ready 55390 session(s) since startup 0 session(s) 0/100 5000 session(s) max min idle cpu 0.00/98.00 *Current Stack Size/Max 240K/240K*
The stack size should be 8192 as defined, but FS shows otherwise.
I'm using centOS x86_64 and a 64 bit version of FS. Is this normal? Thanks.
--
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
