cluster principle is a group of nodes. each node has a different name of course.. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vik Killa" <vipkilla@gmail.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 9:08 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] HA: Starting FreeSWITCH empties the callstable?
was FS 3277: http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3277 actually committed? If not, why? Seems like a good addition.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:24 AM, <B.Tietz@pinguin.ag> wrote:
Hi,
That is the reason. I think FS is able to act as a cluster. So many machines act as one and should have the same name... Just an idea.
greets.
Can I ask when exactly the "switchname" should be used then?
FS 3277: http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3277
Suggests it was implemented for the exact reason of keeping the names of two switches in an HA configuration identical, but it seems they are best
left separate.
I don't mind cleaning up some of the detail in the HA Wiki but would just like to know when the names should be the same and when they should be
different i.e. shoudl the names be the same for kind kind of active / active setup?
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org