Not unless you combining GPL and MPL code in one binary, which I find highly improbable in case of FreeSwitch. And even in this case there seems to be a workaround: "However, MPL 1.1 has a provision (section 13) that allows a program (or parts of it) to offer a choice of another license as well. If part of a program allows the GNU GPL as an alternate choice, or any other GPL-compatible license as an alternate choice, that part of the program has a GPL-compatible license." http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses Brian West wrote:
There actually are issues between the GPL and MPL :P
/b
On Jun 20, 2009, at 11:12 AM, paul.degt wrote:
source software there should be absolutely no difference between GPL and MPL.
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org