Hi, I consider a gateway only reacting to T38 re-INVITES and not initiating T38 re-INVITES "passive". My setup works great for this, the only problem is when both the A- and B-leg send a T38 re-INVITES something goes wrong. Steven
-----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch- users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Steve Underwood Sent: donderdag 1 maart 2012 15:58 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Problems with t38_gateway
On 02/29/2012 09:21 PM, Steven Lam, KeenSystems B.V. wrote:
Hi all,
I'm experimenting with the t38_gateway in mod_spandsp to build a gateway that fully supports "passive" T_38. My test config looks like this: Interesting term. What do you consider to be "passive" T.38?
Steve
__________________________________________________________ _______________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org