18 Apr
2010
18 Apr
'10
4:35 p.m.
That's not very useful you need a full report with extended checking. On Apr 18, 2010 7:34 AM, "Sergey Okhapkin" <sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org> wrote: According to valgrind there are no big leaks. ==12476== LEAK SUMMARY: ==12476== definitely lost: 146,309 bytes in 189 blocks. ==12476== indirectly lost: 176 bytes in 12 blocks. ==12476== possibly lost: 12,336 bytes in 18 blocks. ==12476== still reachable: 1,077,431 bytes in 550 blocks. ==12476== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. On Saturday 17 April 2010, Michael Jerris wrote:
That is a completely incorrect statement. Usi...